Submission declined on 13 May 2025 by Greenman (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Greenman 9 days ago. Last edited by Therian Controls 14 hours ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 13 May 2025 by GoldRomean (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by GoldRomean 10 days ago.

Submission declined on 13 May 2025 by AllCatsAreGrey (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by AllCatsAreGrey 10 days ago.

Submission declined on 12 May 2025 by GoldRomean (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by GoldRomean 10 days ago.

• Comment: This has been declined three times in short succession with minimal improvement. Please read the guidelines carefully. Greenman (talk) 22:19, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: Please explain what this means: "due to certain knowledge the author of this article, is unable to tell if it sounds like marketing or not". GoldRomean (talk) 02:26, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: None of the sources are reliable - the company's website is not, YouTube is not, and security company website is not. GoldRomean (talk) 02:25, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: Entire article is written in a promotional, unencyclopedic/informal tone (e.g. "after a bit the company grew". GoldRomean (talk) 02:24, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: "Devices" and "List of devices" are completely unsourced. GoldRomean (talk) 02:23, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

BluePoint Alert Solutions started in 2013 they had a simple idea, a rapid response system, featuring police alarms, which used the same molds as fire alarms, using blue plastic instead of red, featuring activation devices, and alarm devices, The alarms were manufactured by System Sensor, and Fire-Lite, both being owned by Honeywell, the devices are widely used, in areas where there is a higher risk of danger, devices included alarms, activation devices, and neck worn buttons^[1]

The founder John Mcnutt, had the idea in 2013 for a new security system that would warn people of potential threats and send help, so he started the company licensed as: BluePoint Alert Solutions LLC and after a short while, the company grew, sources say the alarms have saved thousands of lives and so far, as of 2025, no reported news of the company going out of business or struggling

Neck Worn: in case of an emergency these were worn, the person would press the button on it, and it would send help depending on the type it was (police or medical)

Manual Activation: in this list there are 3 pull station types, police, medical, and hazmat spill, pulling one of these if they were in a system would dispatch the corresponding emergency services required or needed

Alerting: strobe devices, would be located by the company, alongside the activation devices (visual only alarms), optional voice alerting could be achieved with speakers (not supplied by the company)

BP-PULL - wireless pull station, with police text^[2]

BP-PS-101P - pull station, with police text

BP-PS-201P - wireless pull station, with police text

SBK - outdoor police strobe made by System Sensor for BluePoint^[2]

SB-I/O - blue version of the Fire-Lite SB-I/O backbox

SA-WBB - gray version of System Sensor SA-WBB (gray outdoor backbox plastic, normal version is red not gray)^[3]

STI-13020CB - police pull station cover featuring police text^[3]