The Afşin-Elbistan power stations are two coal-fired power stations in Turkey, in Afşin District in Kahramanmaraş Province. Both Afşin-Elbistan A, built in the 1980s, and the newer Afşin-Elbistan B burn lignite from the nearby Elbistan coalfield.

Air pollution, such as sulfur dioxide,^[1] is trapped by surrounding mountains,^[2] and Greenpeace alleges that levels of particulates and nitrogen oxides in the atmosphere have exceeded legal limits.^[3] The Environment Ministry has not released flue gas measurements,^[3] and there is no recent public data from the nearest air quality monitor.^[4] As of 2023 official health impact assessment is not done in Turkey,^[5]: 50 but the Right to Clean Air Platform estimates that the power station air pollution has killed over 17 thousand people.^[6]

The National Energy Plan published in 2023 forecast that 1.7 GW more local coal power would be connected to the grid by 2030, but did not say where.^[7]: 15 As of 2024^[update] Çelikler Holding want to build more coal power, despite public opposition,^[8] and are awaiting official approval or rejection of the environmental impact assessment.

Afşin-Elbistan A
Country	Turkey
Status	Operational
Commission date	1984
Çelikler Holding
Thermal power station
Primary fuel	Kışlaköy coal mine
Power generation
Units operational	3
Units planned	2 totalling 688 MW [6]
Nameplate capacity	1,355 MW
Annual net output	1,717 GWh (2020) 1,899 GWh (2019) 210 GWh (2023) 3,686 GWh (2022) 3,710 GWh (2021)
External links
Website	celiklerholding.com/en/energy
[edit on Wikidata]

Afşin-Elbistan A is a 1355 MW lignite-fired power station, owned by Çelikler Holding.

The National Energy Plan published in 2023 forecast that 1.7 GW more local coal power would be connected to the grid by 2030, but did not say where.^[7]: 15

In 2024 Çelikler was considering buying two cheap second-hand steam turbines from shut down American nuclear plants, but was unsure whether suitable steam boilers which could cope with Turkish lignite could be found, as large electrostatic precipitators and flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) would be needed.^[9]

As of September 2024^[update] the environmental impact assessment (EIA) which began in 2022^[6] of adding such 4th and 5th units totalling about 700 MW^[10] is still being considered by the government.^[4] As of 2023 official health impact assessment is not done in Turkey,^[5]: 50 but opponents of the expansion estimate that the extra air pollution could lead to an additional 1900 premature deaths.^[11] This was estimated by using CALPUFF to model dispersion of NO₂, SO₂ and PM2.5; and deposition of mercury was also estimated.^[12] According to the EIA 28 million tonnes of CO2 may be emitted per year,^{[13]: 277 [note 1]} far more than the largest Turkish greenhouse gas emitter in 2022, which was ZETES power stations at 15 million tonnes.^[14]

Brought online from 1984 to 1987 Afşin-Elbistan A is one of the largest installed capacity coal-fired power stations in Turkey and is estimated to emit over 8 million tonnes of CO
₂ per year,^[15] over 1% of Turkey's greenhouse gas emissions. It was depicted on the reverse of the 5000 lira banknotes of 1990–1994.^[16]

In 2004 or 2005 an EIA was done re rehabilitation and FGD.^[17] The plant was shut down in January 2020 due to local air pollution,^[18] but reopened later in 2020.^[19] Delivery of FGD parts was delayed by the COVID-19 pandemic but the filters were installed in 2021.^[20]

In January 2019 locals complained that the plant had been restarted causing ash pollution visible in the snow,^[21] and local MP Sefer Aycan said in parliament he was concerned that the plant would add to the industrial pollution of the Aksu and Ceyhan rivers.^[22] In March 2019 Greenpeace projected the message "These chimneys are spitting poison" onto the plant,^[23] to publicise their earlier report claiming that, together with neighbouring Afşin-Elbistan B, the plants were responsible for 17,000 premature deaths. The area is a sulfur dioxide air pollution hotspot.^[24] According to energy analyst Haluk Direskeneli, writing in 2019, FGD was not installed and electrostatic precipitation was inadequate, and "it is futile to repair this power plant".^[25]

The plant was shut down in January 2020 as it did not meet the flue gas emission limits which came into force that month.^[26] Çelikler planned to have filters installed by June 2020.^[27] The plant reopened but complaints of air pollution continued,^[28] and in October 2021 it was said by opposition MP Ali Öztunç to be still operating without filters due to company lobbying.^[29] In 2020 the fuel oil system was replaced by gas and dry flue gas filters were completed; wet flue gas filters were completed in 2021.^[30]

In 2022 a study found levels of chromium and nickel in the soil exceeding regulations^[31] and the Climate Change Policy and Research Association alleged that the plant was operating illegally according to environmental laws.^[32]: 27 Little power was generated in 2023 due to damage by the earthquakes.^[33]

The plant burns lignite, which is transported by conveyor belt^[34] from the nearby Kışlaköy coal mine. After burning 2% of the lignite remains as slag and 18% as fly ash, and a new landfill site was planned for both of these in 2019.^[35] Use of modified fly ash in concrete has been suggested.^[36]

Afşin-Elbistan B
Country	Turkey
Status	Operational
Commission date	2006
Electricity Generation Company
Thermal power station
Primary fuel	Lignite
Power generation
Nameplate capacity	1,440 MW
Annual net output	1,201 GWh (2021) 2,181 GWh (2023) 2,378 GWh (2020) 2,767 GWh (2022) 2,773 GWh (2019)
External links
Website	www.euas.gov.tr/en-US/power-plants/afsin-elbistan-b-dbzi
[edit on Wikidata]

Afşin-Elbistan B is a 1440MW coal-fired power station in Afşin in Kahramanmaraş Province, state owned by the Electricity Generation Company (EUAŞ).^[37] The plant burns lignite from Kışlaköy coal mine (mostly transported by lorry^[38]) and sometimes from other mines.^[39]

Built between 2004 and 2005 Afşin-Elbistan B is the largest single coal-fired power station in Turkey and is estimated to emit almost 8 million tonnes CO
₂ per year,^[15] over 1% of Turkey's greenhouse gas emissions. Opponents said in 2020 that ash retention filters were disabled on the pretext that they are expensive to clean.^[40] An environmental impact report for proposed ash and slag storage was approved in 2020.^[41] By 2021 unit 3 had been converted to gas.^[42] The plant stopped running late-September 2024,^[43] and due to lack of coal due to a mine landslide it was predicted not to run until some time in 2025.^[44]

In 2021 environmental group TEMA Foundation said that air quality measurements had not been taken in Karamanmaraş for almost 11 months of 2020, and that it was very worrying that the plants continued to operate on temporary permits without the necessary environmental improvements.^[45]

Afşin-Elbistan C was a planned 1800-MW coal-fired power station, which was proposed to be funded by the Turkey Wealth Fund and built by a state-owned mining company to be called Maden Holding. According to the EIA the plant would have burned 23 million tonnes of lignite annually, and emitted over 61 million tonnes of CO₂ each year for 35 years.^[46]: 319 However, in 2021 Turkey targeted net zero carbon emissions by 2053,^[47] and in 2022 the C power station was cancelled.^[48][49]

Like some other power stations in Turkey the proposed three units of 600 MW for Afşin C were planned to be state-owned.^[50] Estimated to cost 17.3 billion lira (2,470,000 USD), at planned capacity 11 TWh per year (about 3%)^[51] of the nation's electricity would have been generated by burning 23 million tonnes of Turkish lignite annually.^[52]

The site, on the border in Afşin district,^[53] is near the two existing Afşin-Elbistan power stations. In 2019, compulsory purchase of the land was authorised by President Erdoğan,^[54] and diversion of Hurman Creek would have allowed more access to Elbistan coalfield as well as supplying the plant's cooling water.^{[55][needs update]} In 2021 negotiations with Chinese companies continued.^[3] But later in 2021 China stopped funding overseas coal power.^[56][57]

The station was planned to run almost 7000 hours per year to generate 11,380 GWh.^[58] By using a supercritical boiler, the plant would have been more efficient and emitted less local air pollution than all other large (over 400 MW) local lignite-fuelled power stations in Turkey, as they use subcritical boilers. According to the Turkey Wealth Fund, the plant would have been environmentally friendly, using the latest emission control technologies.^[59] But, according to campaign group Right to Clean Air Platform, it would still have resulted in thousands of early deaths over the lifetime of the plant.^[60] Cooling water would have been supplied from Hurman Creek via the Karakuz Dam,^[61][62] (which was completed in 2024^[63]). According to Climate Action Network Europe the plant would have increased the risk of drought in the area.^[64]

The coalfield also has D and E sectors but, although D and E power stations were planned in the early 21st century,^[65]: 27 these are not in use.^[66]: 75

Article 56 of the constitution says that “Everyone has the right to live in a healthy and balanced environment. It is the duty of the State and citizens to improve the natural environment, to protect the environmental health and to prevent environmental pollution.”[1] In 2024 Human Rights Watch alleged that the existing power stations and proposed expansion contravene the constitution and violate the human rights of nearby residents by damaging their health.^[79]

According to the Right to Clean Air Platform Turkey the power stations have caused over 17 thousand premature deaths as of 2024.^[6] The Health and Environment Alliance estimate almost one hundred thousand cases of bronchitis have been caused, mostly in children.^[4] There is an air quality monitoring station in Elbistan, which is 22 km away from the power stations, and its data is public: however data from air quality monitoring 3 km from the power stations is not public.^[4]

Health and Environment Alliance estimate that phasing out coal by 2030, instead of when the A and B power plant licences end in 2038 and 2052 respectively, would prevent over 2000 premature deaths.^[80]: 14 There is a pollutant release and transfer register, but as of September 2024 no years are publicly searchable because it is not yet technically complete, and it is not known what pollution sources will be granted exemptions.(see FAQ).^[81] According to Greenpeace many people in nearby villages, such as Çoğalhan and Altınelma, complain of asthma.^[82] Çoğulhan has 3 times the SO2 level of Elbistan.^[4] Climate Trace has estimated 2023 local air pollution from the A plant at: 120t PM_2.5, 9.35Kt NO_x, and 10.52Kt SO₂.^[83]

According to Çelikler the A plant and mine employed 1450 people, mostly local, in 2024.^[84]

The C plant was planned to operate for 35 years and was proposed to be funded by the Turkey Wealth Fund (TWF), the country's sovereign wealth fund, being a major partner.^[85] This is in accordance with the energy policy of Turkey, which prioritises local sources of energy to reduce coal and natural gas imports, partly in order to maintain energy security. Verus Partners advised on finance,^[86] but despite low production costs,^[87] the private sector was not interested, as the coal is low-quality. The TWF claimed the plant would have an economic life of 35 years,^[88] create "serious employment",^[27] and Vice President Fuat Oktay said in 2020 that it would reduce the current account deficit.^[89] According to Greenpeace local farmers say ash has reduced their crop yields.^[82] In 2024 Greenpeace argued that the proposed 36b lira investment in new coal power would be better spent on solar power and energy storage.^[82]

The Afşin-Elbistan C EIA estimated CO₂ emissions would be more than 60 million tonnes of CO₂ per year:^[46] and it was accepted by the government.^[90] For comparison, total annual greenhouse gas emissions by Turkey are less than 575 million tonnes;^[91] thus about a tenth of greenhouse gas emissions by Turkey would have been from the planned power station.^{[note 2][note 3][97]} Space-based measurements of carbon dioxide means the public will know the level of emissions almost in real time.^[98][99]

Ali Öztunç, local MP and environment spokesperson for the main opposition Republican People's Party, spoke out against the proposed C plant and asked in a parliamentary question why it should be built on agricultural land.^[100] Environmentalists claimed the country already had too much electricity generating capacity^[101] and contended that the plant would damage local water resources.^[102] Environmental and public health groups criticised the proposed C plant EIA for describing coal as clean energy^[103] and, in February 2020, thousands of people filed petitions against its approval:^[104] but it was approved by the Ministry of Environment and Urbanisation in March.^[105] In 2021 an expert report commissioned by the Maraş Regional Administrative Court said that the EIA positive decision given to Afşin-Elbistan C was faulty as it failed to accurately assess the project's environmental pollution and impact on agricultural activities, water basins and human health.^[106] Environmental group TEMA Foundation said that, as Turkey had recently ratified the Paris Agreement to limit climate change, the plans to build the C plant should be immediately abandoned.^[107] In 2021 the C plant was cancelled.

In 2024 the mayors of Elbistan and nearby Nurhak opposed the proposed expansion of the A plant.^[108]

According to a 2020 survey from nearby Kahramanmaraş Sütçüimam University most locals say they have chronic illness, and almost all believe that environmental protection measures taken by power plant managers are insufficient.^[109] Opponents of the plants say that: "a significant portion of the people living in Afşin Elbistan are struggling with cancer or respiratory tract diseases."^[40]

Coal power in Turkey

• Afşin-Elbistan power stations on Global Energy Monitor
• Report on health effects (in Turkish) by the Right to Clean Air Platform Turkey
• B plant tenders (in Turkish)
• Report on health effects(in Turkish) by the Right to Clean Air Platform Turkey