A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on August 2, 2014, August 2, 2015, August 2, 2018, August 2, 2021, August 2, 2023, and August 2, 2024.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums United States: Government Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

The census information from www.census.gov/population/documentation/twps0027/tab02.txt shows NYC as 33,131 and Philadelphia as 28,522.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.123.105.3 (talk)12:49, July 5, 2007 (UTC)

They do not work. 99.230.152.143 (talk) 01:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

and greater Philidelphia was 4 square miles big and had 44,096 there was no greater new york area newyork had no suburbs adn only measured at best 2 miles big so rank NYC 2nd like it rightfully was

rank Philidelpih higher than Newyork city by including northern liberties and south wark "southern liberties" both of these towns were close to one mile big and also massachusetts had 51,202 people classified as urban in 1790 so mention that also —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.211.9.198 (talk) 18:42, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

I would correct but I do not know how. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.126.36.121 (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the table and it was working fine, sorting the content properly, numerically. It appears as if, in the course of the last five years, an anonymous hero has corrected this error for the page. CarlsonC (talk) 16:44, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1790 United States Census. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:56, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2020 United States Census which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Before my one edit today, which changed only the Massachusetts figure in the "Total" column, there were the following discrepancies in the article's table of states and territories:

1. Delaware: 59,094 is 2 less than the sum of the appropriate columns; this is explained in a footnote to the table.
2. Massachusetts: 387,787 is 9,000 more than the sum of the appropriate columns; what is the explanation?
3. New Hampshire: 141,801 is 84 less than the sum of the appropriate columns; what is the explanation?
4. Vermont: 85,529 is 10 less than the sum of the appropriate columns; what is the explanation?
5. National total: 3,964,905 is 32,176 more than the sum of the appropriate columns; what is the explanation?

President Lethe (talk) 22:09, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you check the source provided it shows data for 1790 with a large spike as those other towns are lumped in, before returning to its actual population of around 5000 seen in 1782 and in 1800. I suggest a note here since this distorts the importance of Norwalk in Connecticut at the time 87.210.242.77 (talk) 11:36, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When an item is available from both locations, which should we link to? I accidentally duplicated the Virginia one at Archive.org. I like to saw logs! (talk) 23:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]