Talk:1952 barrel incident

Technopedia Center

Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science
S1 Informatics S1 Information Systems S1 Information Technology S1 Computer Engineering S1 Electrical Engineering S1 Civil Engineering

faculty of Economics and Business
S1 Management S1 Accountancy

Faculty of Letters and Educational Sciences
S1 English literature S1 English language education S1 Mathematics education S1 Sports Education

Talk:1952 barrel incident - Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request

This page is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a restricted topic. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.)

Administrators may disregard the above message.
You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If administrator}}. You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning { display: none; }

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
All participants in formal discussions (RfCs, RMs, etc) within the area of conflict are urged to keep their comments concise, and are limited to 1,000 words per discussion. Citations and quotations (whether from sources, Wikipedia articles, Wikipedia discussions, or elsewhere) do not count toward the word limit.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Military history: Middle East / Early Muslim / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	Early Muslim military history task force (c. 600 – c. 1600)
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Notability

Could someone please explain how this article isn't notable, or how it's sources aren't sufficient? It's sources include two UN reports from UN websites, a Jstor article, and an entire chapter from a participant involved in it. As for notability, it entails a nation taking over a United Nations Headquarters and holding it by force of arms. If it could be elaborated upon what the issues with the provided sources are, or in what way the article isn't notable, I'd appreciate it. UncleBourbon (talk) 00:29, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, UncleBourbon. I'm afraid I did not see this message so thanks for alerting me to it on my talk page. I raised the concern about notability purely based on the sources already cited. As I understand it, WP:EVENT is merely a gloss on WP:GNG which requires that a topic is presumed to have met the criteria for notability if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The article currently cites only two reliable sources (excluding those classed as WP:PRIMARY which includes memoirs and compendiums of primary sources) and I am unclear whether either discusses the incident in detail. This puts it in risky territory from a notability perspective. Hope this helps. —Brigade Piron (talk) 17:51, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Categories:

Hidden categories: