This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums United States: Government / Governors Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. governors (assessed as Low-importance). Politics: American Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance). Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'm not sure how to do it, but in the image, West Virginia needs to be colored blue. ProfessorPlum27 21:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)ProfessorPlum27[reply]

Also, North Dakota does not have term-limits. Politics rule 11:25, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should the Louisian's gubernatorial race really be on the chart in this article? That race is in 2007, not 2008. ~~goodleh 00:23, 26 September 2007

Why is Illinois on there? I thought governors ran for four years, with Blagojevich being re-elected last year. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.47.225.104 (talk) 05:32, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Added information and notation on Utah Gov race. 155.70.23.45 (talk) 17:14, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Surely there should be an explanation of what "gubernatorial" is. Although the word comes from Latin it is only used in the USA and many English speakers from other countries have no idea what it means. I had suspected that it was related to Governor elections but only knew for sure thanks to Wiktionary. --217.203.133.242 (talk) 00:05, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No offense, but the word is heard enough times, especially during elections, that it's fairly commonplace. Gubernatorial is the adjective form of governor. The word is used much like presidential, as in presidential elections. It is true that adjectives like mayoral, senatorial, presidential, and gubernatorial aren't used all that much outside of elections, but they are simply adjectives that derive from the nouns mayor, senate, president, and governor. I will admit that gubernatorial is one that probably makes more sense in its Latin origin than it does in English. I am guessing the word governor might be an older latin word, and those can often be a little more peculiar to modern day Latin based languages which makes them even more peculiar in a language like ours that is the bastard step child of Latin and old Germanic languages. But I am only guessing as to why gubernatorial is a little less obvious as an adjective form. I'm not a linguist or anything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdlund (talk • contribs) 17:23, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I might be wrong on this one, but if Obama were to be elected, I believe that the current governor of Delaware Ruth Ann Miner would actually be the one to pick Biden's replacement. I'm just trying to figure out the timeline, and if I'm thinking about this correctly she would be choosing his replacement before any new governor would be sworn in. I'm assuming that Biden wouldn't wait until January 4th to resign his seat in the senate and that whenever he resigned his seat the governor at that time would choose a replacement. I guess I fail to see why it would fall on the new governor necessarily. Are there any credible sources that say it's definitely the new governor would be the one to fill that vacancy? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdlund (talk • contribs) 14:14, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should clear this whole section. First of all, it's totally unsourced. Moreover, it probably can never be properly sourced, because there's no body that counts all the popular votes for all of these totally separate elections in different jurisdictions. At best, it will be an irrelevant, synthesis of way too many sources. Lastly, I don't think it's even accurate. It lists the "Samoa Reunification Party," but I've never seen any evidence outside of Wikipedia that such an organization has ever existed. -LtNOWIS (talk) 09:01, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on United States gubernatorial elections, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080405165123/http://www.rasmussenreports.com:80/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_governor_elections/washington/election_2008_washington_governor to http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_governor_elections/washington/election_2008_washington_governor

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]