This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

National Football League Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Green Bay Packers Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Bay Packers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Green Bay Packers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Green Bay PackersWikipedia:WikiProject Green Bay PackersTemplate:WikiProject Green Bay PackersGreen Bay Packers Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Wisconsin Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.packers.com/news/releases/2010/04/26/1/
  • In Jeremy Thompson (American football) on 2011-05-08 02:55:29, 404 Not Found
  • In 2010 Green Bay Packers season on 2011-06-18 13:56:57, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 13:57, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is now an entire subsection devoted to Adrian Battles' experience at the Super Bowl, when he was neither a member of the active roster at the time, nor a notable figure during the Super Bowl festivities. There is now seven entire sentences devoted to this non-notable practice squad player and zero sentences about the actual game. I propose that this section be removed as irrelevant to the article. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:11, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The AfD discussion was closed on the premise that the content could and would be merged here. If that is not done, then the Adrian Battles article should be restored. He is not non-notable. For the reasons set forth in the AfD, he is, in fact, notable based on his collegiate football career, his time with the Vikings and Packers, and the substantial news coverage that was given to his career. Cbl62 (talk) 21:38, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The AfD was closed as "redirect," not "merge." If he was notable, the AfD would have been closed as "keep" or at the very least, "merge." Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:20, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I !voted redirect, but should have changed to merge after Cbl62 pointed out the sources.—Bagumba (talk) 01:18, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added the content as a result of the AfD for Battles . While I did not !vote to keep, there is information that needs to be preserved. The text might need to be shortened, it was a first pass cut-n-paste, and I couldn't think of a better placement. Feel free to improve, but the issue is more that text is needed on the Super Bowl here, not that all mention of Battles should be removed.—Bagumba (talk) 22:01, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CANTFIX, a subsection of WP:PRESERVE, points out that undue weight should be removed, which includes trivia (which is what this should be considered since it is not directly relevant to this article by any means). Maybe there could be a line at Super Bowl XLV under the Super Bowl pregame news and notes subsection, where the information is a little more relevant. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:20, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He was employed by the Packers in 2010, so he is most relevant here, while he would be trivial for the general Super Bowl XLV article. The question is how much weight, which is exaggerated by the current lack of text for the Super Bowl in this article. However, there is no deadline, and there is no reason to fully remove text that has some place (though perhaps less weight) in a finished article. I've tagged the sections for expansion and undue, so readers of the article will be aware of current concerns when reading and perhaps edit to improve. —Bagumba (talk) 00:44, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is trivial for this article, too, since one of their practice squad players being featured in two pictures and being jokingly referred to as a good luck charm is not relevant to this article. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:58, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the text here to see what the consensus would be to how much detail (if any) was warranted. I think he deserves at least a one sentence mention, unless consensus says his being on the roster listing is all that is warranted. —Bagumba (talk) 01:16, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 2010 Green Bay Packers season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100507004217/http://www.packers.com:80/news/releases/2010/05/03/1 to http://www.packers.com/news/releases/2010/05/03/1/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100523020525/http://www.packers.com:80/news/releases/2010/05/20/1 to http://www.packers.com/news/releases/2010/05/20/1/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100308040945/http://www.packers.com:80/news/releases/2010/03/05/1 to http://www.packers.com/news/releases/2010/03/05/1/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100428000828/http://packers.com:80/news/releases/2010/04/26/1/ to http://www.packers.com/news/releases/2010/04/26/1/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:19, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]