This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Football Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The max number of points Malta can get is 12. Through the combination of other group games, it is impossible for fewer than 2 teams to get fewer than 13 points. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.252.72.28 (talk) 19:01, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@99.252.72.28:. You are wrong about MLT eliminated. There is one combination: ENG 23 points, and other 5 teams 12 points each, MLT maybe on 2nd place.

For example:
10.06.2017 LTU SVK 1 1
01.09.2017 LTU SCO 1 0
01.09.2017 MLT ENG 7 0
01.09.2017 SVK SVN 1 1
04.09.2017 ENG SVK 5 0
04.09.2017 SCO MLT 0 7
04.09.2017 SVN LTU 0 1
05.10.2017 ENG SVN 5 0
05.10.2017 MLT LTU 7 0
05.10.2017 SCO SVK 1 1
08.10.2017 LTU ENG 0 5
08.10.2017 SVK MLT 0 7
08.10.2017 SVN SCO 0 1

GAV80 (talk) 19:31, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA Group F. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160626094547/http://www.uefa.com/worldcup/news/newsid%3D2257685.html to http://www.uefa.com/worldcup/news/newsid%3D2257685.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:15, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA Group F's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "regulations":

• From 2018 FIFA World Cup Group G: "Regulations – 2018 FIFA World Cup Russia" (PDF). FIFA.com. Fédération Internationale de Football Association. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 July 2017. Retrieved 16 November 2017. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
• From UEFA Euro 2016 qualifying: "Regulations of the UEFA European Football Championship 2014–16" (PDF). UEFA.com.
• From 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification: "Regulations – 2018 FIFA World Cup Russia" (PDF). FIFA.com.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:31, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]