This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC This article was accepted from this draft on 11 March 2020 by reviewer DGG (talk · contribs). COVID-19 Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19 Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Economics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Energy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. International relations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Russia: History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the history of Russia task force. Saudi Arabia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Saudi Arabia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Saudi ArabiaWikipedia:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaTemplate:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Finance & Investment Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Climate change Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

I've created WikiProject COVID-19 as a temporary or permanent WikiProject and invite editors to use this space for discussing ways to improve coverage of the ongoing 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. Please bring your ideas to the project/talk page. Stay safe, --Another Believer _(Talk) 18:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I wanted somewhere else but landed here and since I'm or was at least more or less active in German wikipedia and a bit in English... I understand this article is about the very short Russia-Saudi oil price war, but still things like the historic record cuts (the cuts represent the global end ww2 oil consumption/production) were not made by them alone but by OPEC+ as even the sources all are talking about ("OPEC and its allies led by Russia...." for this one).

OPEC+ earlier (1st passage):

The price war was triggered by a break-up in dialogue between the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and Russia over proposed oil-production cuts in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.[1] Russia walked out of the agreement, leading to the fall of the OPEC+ alliance.

As we should always assume that someone is reading the articles or sentences who has absolutely no deeper knowledge about the topic, than the OPEC and Russia did meet and because Russia walked out of the "dialogue" and that lead to the "fall" of OPEC+? So OPEC+ means OPEC + Russia only? For me dialogue also would be a sign as in most cases you take the word if 2 parties are talking, but ofc its not wrong also in this context, but talks and written that OPEC+ (at least there are some other important parties except Russia, Azerbaijan with an extreme important oil history, Kazakhstan with a huge potential in increasing oil production beyond 2 or even 3 mbpd, Mexico only is losing importance since Cantarell peaked in 2004 but is still the I think 2nd largest crude source for the US and for that reimports large amounts of gasoline.

What exactly does: leading to the fall of OPEC+ alliance. means? For me with bad English it sounds like the end of the alliance and not like they did other meetings where the largest problem to finish the deal was not Russia or no OPEC Member but Mexico which should reduce output by afair 400,000 bpd (or even 500k?) but only offered 100k because that would really have been a catastrophy for Mexican. Trump did offer to take 250kbpd from reductions in the Gulf of Mexico, but these reduction in that size were going to happen anyway and Trump had almost nothing he could do against this, at least not for free, but the worst president in US history in the 20th and 21st Century is another story. OPEC+ does very well looking at the deal in total, means cut were reached by more than 99% and thanks to largely Saudi but also other Persian Gulf states sometimes over 101% and the duration was increased many times, saving the world from even much higher filled tanks. That Venezuela, Libya and Iran because of sanctions, (civil) war, sanctions does not count is maybe a thing for another article... and that the cuts reached "only" between over 99% and over 101% or 102% was and is the fault of countries like Iraq, Nigeria, Angola and the small new OPEC members like Gabon. For Ecuador that agreement would have been the reason to leave immediately if they wouldn't already have done that just shortly before...

So shouldn't this "war" and the article be limited to March?! In April they hammered out that record cut of 9.7 million bpd, while the US continued to produce as long as they could over 13, than 12 and so on million barrels per day, doesn't sound for me like Russians leaving the meeting lead to "fall", without them it wouldn't have been "only" 106 companies from the Oil sector going bankrupt in the US in 2020 and their recorded deficit is as low as it only has been in 1 year before and for 2021 the first profit (so far a 363 billion(!) USD deficit was reported for shale oil companies, with or without other newest technologies like Fracking, but most use what ever they can, and only the high prices with extreme reduced drilling and other costs allowed them to get as low as 35$ per barrel or even a bit less to operate without losses...) Just some ideas Kilon22 (talk) 19:42, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]