Aberdeen F.C. has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result January 24, 2008 Good article nominee Not listed April 2, 2008 Good article nominee Listed May 2, 2008 Featured article candidate Not promoted
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Football: Scotland Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Scottish football task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Scotland Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pardon the perhaps unusual question. I am writing from the US. I have a medallion from a long ago Scotland Soccer event and would like to obtain some information on it. The Medallion has A.J. F. A. on the left side and 1903-04 on the right side. The center appears to be an upright Lion. The back of the Medallion states -Challenge Cup and my Father in Law's fathers's name- Thomas Geddes. Can someone please help with some history on the subject and what might A.J.F.A. stand for? Thank you for any assistance. Ed and Carol

My guess is Aberdeen Juvenile Football Association. Catchpole 10:04, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POV/non-encyclopedic stuff in the Bright Future section should be cleaned up - particularly the last line: "And so we wait for the next season - reading rumours, and watching the world cup." QuinnHK 12:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Can anyone tell me why Aberdeen are called "the Dons"? (I was contemplating including a brief explanation under the Dons article.)

--Matt derry 12:26, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, the precursor to Aberdeen F.C. - Aberdeen - was founded by local schoolmasters, and the River Don runs through the city.

--Discosebastian 17:57, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• According to the club's official history, there is some doubt over the whole 'schoolmasters' theory. The word 'Don' is not common in Aberdeen, and is unlikely to have been used by a football crowd. The author, Jack Webster, speculates that it could well have been a contraction of 'Aberdonian'; via 'The 'Donians' to 'The Dons'. He does have one concrete fact, however: the nickname was first used in print in a report on the Celtic game on February 15th, 1913. Certainly, before this date, the club nickname was the 'Black and Golds' or 'The Wasps' It's understood/By every single person/Who'd be elsewhere /If they could 17:42, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I think the shortening of Aberdonian is more likely than the schoolmaster link. Catchpole 09:04, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes. I've got Webster's book too, and I can only agree.

--Discosebastian 22:52, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was brought up a die-hard Don, and while I clearly remember the story about Donald Colman and the world's first 'dug-out' (which I'll write up shortly), I don't think we were the first club to have floodlights. My invaluable Jack Webster book gives the date as 1959, which seems kind of late to me - European games had been going on for several seasons before then, and weren't the famous Moscow Dynamo team in Britain to play floodlit games long before then? I'll do some digging. Watty1962 22:39, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There may not be much history before 1980 (in terms of trophies, at least), but I think this could be given a bit more prominence. If I get time, I'll do some work on it, and see if I can't construct something a bit more solid. Watty1962 22:39, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it's a pretty major revision in the end - there may be one or two links which need attention; I'll come back to them in the next day or so. My aim was to give equal prominence to all parts of the club's history - I felt that the previous version had way too much detail on the last 5 years, and almost nothing on the 1950s, for example, when the club won several major trophies. I've tried to be as objective as possible; please let me know if anything still needs work.

I've removed the floodlight reference; I can't find anything which leads me to believe that AFC were the first to introduce them.

I've also taken out the 'expand' tag - I've done as much as I can to list famous players - feel free to put it back if you think there's more to do.

Watty1962 06:14, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aberdeen aren't one of three teams in Scotland to have never been relegated; Gretna and Elgin City have never been relegated, and there are probably more. Surely the line should be changed to something like "one of three teams in the SPL to have never been relegated?" Swaddon1903 14:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, Swaddon1903. Don'tClickHere^{chat / what i've done / email} 15:52, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah but Gretna and ICT are also SPL sides who have never been relegated, so the total is five. 82.13.251.172 (talk) 14:19, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not Gretna any more. They don't even exist any more.--Aberdeen fc (talk) 20:57, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aye, but they did at the time. Swaddon1903 (talk) 09:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think they're meaning that Aberdeen, Rangers, and Celtic are the 3 teams who haven't been relegated from the top-flight since there formation - Anonymous —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.138.136.31 (talk) 17:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that's what it means :P Nicolizzio 19:47, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

I've gone through this and removed anything which seems redundant or not verifiable, as follows:

• Goalkeeper Mark De Clerk scored on his debut versus Berwick Rangers in 1980; a Belgian keeper, signed from a Dutch club, scoring for a Scottish side on English soil. Changed spelling to 'de Clerck', which I believe to be correct. No source for this info, although I remember it well. I'll try to get some more info on this
• Pittodrie was the first all seater stadium in Scotland and the first sports venue in the uk to have a dug-out. They were discovered during a tour of Iceland and brought back by trainer Donald Coleman in the early 1930s, Everton then played Aberdeen in a friendly and took them down to England. Pitoddrie was not the first all-seater stadium in Scotland - New Kilbowie was, although they had a whole side at least uncovered. Pitoddrie was trumpeted often as the first 'all seated, all-covered' stadium in Britain, but there are many of us who suffered the elements at either end of the South Stand who could tell you that this wasn't strictly true, either - but if verification can be found for this, it could go in. More troubling is the dugout stuff. It flatly contradicts the reference earlier in the article, and has no verifiable source. I have never heard the story of a trip to Iceland (which would have been unusual in the 1930s) or had any other source say anything other than that Colman was the inventor. If there is a source for this information, which would contradict the source I have (see references), then I'd like to know more.

It's common knowledge in Aberdeen - all my family have heard of the tour to Iceland and the bringing back the dugouts - sadly wikipedia would rather have some nonsense published on a website as a source than actual fact.

• Aberdeen are the only Scottish team to have won two European trophies - the European Cup Winners Cup against Real Madrid on 11 May 1983 and later that year the European Super Cup against the European Cup holders Hamburg.
• Aberdeen, along with the 'Old Firm', are the only sides in Scottish football never to have been relegated from the top flight.Removed, per earlier discussions - not true, in any case
• The first ever Aberdeen goalscorer was Willie McAulay against Stenhousemuir on 15 August 1903 in front of 8,000 spectators in Pittodrie.I don't doubt it, but what is the source? Mine agrees in all other respects, but does not give the name of the scorer.
• Due to the perceived isolation of Aberdeen compared to the rest of Scotland, Aberdeen fans have been labelled 'sheep shaggers'. Consequently Aberdeen fans have taken pride in reinforcing this allegation and inflatable sheep are a frequent sight at games. It's true, but again - no source

Watty1962 00:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I go to a lot of Aberdeen's games and not once have I seen an inflatable sheep. Don'tClickHere^{chat / what i've done / email} 15:54, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't comment on whether they are a regular sight, but...[1] Archibald99 16:02, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen loads of them during a game Vs Celtic in 2005 - Anonymous —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.138.136.31 (talk) 17:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can this line be verified "Their reward, however, was not to be a place in the first European Cup competition - Scotland's place was awarded to Hibs." As I understand it, Hibs were only involved because the teams above them refused entry - this line makes it seem like Aberdeen were somehow bypassed in preference of a different team.Largo1965 15:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They were bypassed. There was no stipulation that entrants to the first competition had to be league champions, although most associations did nominate their reigning champions. The SFA nominated Hibs as Scotland's entrant, although there appears a possible conflict of interest in this process - the President of the SFA at that time just happened to be Harry Swan, also chairman of Hibs. This article should prove a suitable reference. Caledonian Place 01:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that the history section be given its own article as it seems a bit long-winded to be on the main article? Not that there's anything wrong with the section itself, I just think that it merits its own article. Swaddon1903 10:34, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree - that approach is in line with the template for football clubs, and it would streamline this article. I've done a piece on club colours as well, but I don't have time right now to edit down the history section, so it'll stay in both places for a short time until I can get back to it. Watty1962 23:35, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it's all done. I've rewritten the history section, perhaps it's too drastic an edit, but the old one is now on the new page, so feel free to amend as you see fit. I'm researching a short piece on the crest as well, although as with the 'colours' section, some corroboration other than my memory would be a positive thing.Watty1962 03:34, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why not have Brian Irvine, Peter Kjaer, Scott Severin and Scott Booth in this section? Also does Cato Guntveit have to be here? I'm not sure if he was that notable.

Severin is a current player, and I've noticed that for some reason, a legend like Brian Irvine doesn't have a Wikipedia article. Or at least he didn't when I last checked. Swaddon1903 (talk) 14:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think that this article has a lot going for it, but needs a fair bit of tidying and reassessment. If I look at the template, I think we are not a million miles away from it, but there are some glaring improvements required:

• References! I have a few reference texts, and I'll try to work through those in the coming days to try to improve things on this score

I've made a start: it already looks a lot healthier

• The History, Stadium, and Colours sections are decent, but could do with some fleshing out in places. There is no 'Supporters' section; I have no verifiable source for anything, but I'm sure such things exist.

Made some amendments; introduced a Supporters section. If anyone has references for the two places I've indicated, that would be great.

• UEFA Cup 2007/8 - is in entirely the wrong article. If it needs to exist (and I suppose it does, on balance), it should be in the current season article - but it ought there to be balanced by a section on each of the competitions. As it stands, in the main article on the club, it is half as long as the entire section on the club's 100+ year history. It's also somewhat subjective in places.

Deleted for now - I have a copy in my sandbox; I'll try to figure out what to do with it in due course

• Aberdeenshire Cup - gets more prominence than any of the senior trophies - more words on this insignificant local cup than for the two European trophies, which is absurd. If it is truly notable, the Cup should have its own article; as it stands, it elevates it to a ridiculous degree - essentially, AFC have until recently been the only senior club in the competition, and generally entered it with reserve or youth squads. I'm a fan, and I'm struggling to make it sound notable.

See above

• Famous Players - I'm still 3 short on the Hall of Fame, which I've been working away at all year. Teddy Scott is going to be the biggest problem; all sources agree how important he has been to the club, but few, if any, give biographical detail. I don't know his full name, his date or place of birth, or even, shamefully, if he's still alive. Any help with that would be most welcome. The others I will get to in due course. Beyond those, the remaining players definitely need to be fleshed out. Missing notables include the likes of Alex Jackson, the Yorstons, Donald Colman (who really should have an article of his own), Matt Armstrong, Paddy Buckley, Willie Mills, Bobby Wishart - the list goes on: the history of the club goes back beyond 1978...

Much improved; still plenty to do

• Honours - this may well reflect the page on the club website, but so many of these trophies are insignificant to the point of obscurity - anyone got any idea what the Dewar Shield was? I propose that this is stripped back to notable trophies, and I remain to be convinced that reaching the third round of the UEFA Cup (for example) is in any way an 'honour'. To my mind, this section for all clubs should reflect trophies won by the senior team in competition with other senior teams, and perhaps at a push runners-up positions. Beyond that, it looks suspiciously like cruft to me.
• Records and Achievements - looks suspiciously like a trivia section in parts.

I'll use this as a kind of 'to-do list' over the coming weeks as I have time; feel free to disagree or convince me otherwise. Watty1962 (talk) 00:09, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Watty1962 (talk) 22:29, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've made some fairly major changes; I'd like to know what people think - I'm not sure how much more could or should be on a main page, given that there are several sub-pages. I'm no expert, but I feel it can't be far away from GA status - I might submit it just to get some feedback.Watty1962 (talk) 01:11, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I just went ahead and submitted it - let's see... Watty1962 (talk) 01:17, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At last, all the members of the Hall of Fame have an article. Next up, I'll work on the two remaining 'Famous players', then I guess it's back to the start to see if I can flesh out any of these a bit more. Watty1962 (talk) 03:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Updated: Watty1962 (talk) 07:10, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to try and work on this. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{tell me a joke...} 17:30, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• The colours and crest section is weak on references.

Also just a quick note on dashes and hyphens. Hyphenated words should just have a hyphen, e.g. all-red. whereas dashes in the middle of sentences should be either spaced endashes, or unspaced dashes, e.g. "and the early 1980s shirts—as worn at the 1983 European Cup Winners Cup final—featured white vertical pinstripes." or "and the early 1980s shirts – as worn at the 1983 European Cup Winners Cup final &ndashes; featured white vertical pinstripes." but try remain consistent, using just one or the other. See WP:DASH for more details. I think I've corrected them.

I'll put it on hold for now until you can fix the above points. Drop me a line when you've done. Peanut4 (talk) 21:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• One more thing. A fair few of those references would not pass WP:RS. There are other wiki projects and forums in there for a start of. Peanut4 (talk) 22:27, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to pass it now, because you've done a superb job, from both the first review a couple of months back, and since starting this second nomination. Excellent work. However, with a bit more work this could reach be put forward for FAC, so I'll leave you a short list for some more work to push it on.

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

To get it up to featured status, my suggestions would be:

• Check to see if the sources all meet WP:RS. You've certainly made improvements since last night, and at first glance, they do seem to be.
• Possibly use {{cite news}} or {{cite web}} to generate your references. You will need author's names, and dates that articles appeared to go in there too. And I'm not sure you need to say publisher is news.bbc.co.uk, just either BBC News or BBC Sport, etc.  Done
• I think the Stadium section could be expanded a little bit.
• Possibly find a picture of Aberdeen supporters for the supporters section.
• Once you've done that, head either for League of Copyeditors to brush up any English, or Peer Review for further input (or both) and then onto FAC.
• Oh, and watch out for recentism. The last few lines of the history section are stacked up in favour of recent weeks.

Overall, great work. If you've any other queries, don't hesitate in giving me a shout back. Peanut4 (talk) 14:44, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't like leaving lengthy lists of individuals issues on FAC, where they can take up a disproportionate amount of space, so I'm putting further comments here.

I think the article could benefit from a third party copyedit. I've taken a closer look at one particular section (Stadium) as an example, here are in depth comments:

• Aberdeen have played their home matches at Pittodrie Stadium, Aberdeen, since before their amalgamation in 1903,[31] where they were originally renting the ground, and proceeded to buy it in 1920. What Tony would call a "snake", which should be split into more than one sentence. The wording also implies that Aberdeen have played there since before they existed, when in fact in means the previous Aberdeen club. Here is an alternative: Aberdeen have played at Pittodrie Stadium throughout their existence. The ground was first used by the original Aberdeen F.C. in 1899; when they merged with two other teams in 1903, the new club took over the old Aberdeen ground. The club initially rented the ground, but subsequently bouth it in 1920.
• The stadium consists of four stands: the Main Stand, which houses the club offices and players facilities; the Merkland Road Stand, or the family stand; the South Stand, a quarter of which is used to accommodate travelling supporters, except for Old Firm games, where half of this stand is given to the visiting fans; and the newest element, the Richard Donald stand at the East, or Beach End, of the ground, named after former chairman Dick Donald. Again, all one sentence. The staium is more than just the stands, there's also the small matter of the pitch. The description of the main stand makes it sound as though it is purely offices and changing rooms.
• Other information such as record attendance could be included.
• Is the information about the new stadium based on possiblity or certainty? The reference talks of a "possible development", but that sort of thing has been talked of for years without anything happening. Oldelpaso (talk) 22:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've addressed all of those issues. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 22:24, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another I've noticed: They are also the only Scottish team to have won two European trophies, both in the same season - The Super Cup was won in December 1983, so while it was in the same year, it occurred during the following season. Oldelpaso (talk) 16:33, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• • • Yeah, you're right - fixed. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 19:31, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It has been proposed to move Aberdeen to Aberdeen, Scotland or Aberdeen city, and to move Aberdeen (disambiguation) to Aberdeen. The discussion about this is here. For what it's worth, Aberdeen F.C. arguably is the primary topic of "Aberdeen". --Una Smith (talk) 16:21, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not really. Obviously Aberdeen is? weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 20:15, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and note to anyone reading this - the discussion was closed and the articles were not moved. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 20:16, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do a Google search for "Aberdeen" and the first hit usually is the football club. But more to the point, rather a lot of links to Aberdeen are like this: [[Aberdeen]] F.C.. See? They are links that intend Aberdeen F.C., but don't quite make it. --Una Smith (talk) 01:09, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Erm, that still doesn't make it the primary topic. Futhermore I have never seen a link like that. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 18:41, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Does this belong in the article? I was thinking of moving it to the List of Aberdeen F.C. statistics and records or creating a list of international players like Rangers and Hibernian have and adding it to that. Or it could just be deleted. Swaddon1903 (talk) 18:46, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How long has "the sheep are on fire" been a chant? In my memory, it started after an incident in which a supporter's sheep costume was accidentally set alight during some horseplay on the way to a match c.2010, I think someone was charged for it, and got a caution or maybe a token fine. Basically it all blew over but the chant caught on... like wildfire, you might say. Of course I may be remembering this all wrong. --Walnuts go kapow (talk) 14:47, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Related to a Hibs v Aberdeen match in October 2009. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 15:13, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Crikey, quite a bit more serious than I remembered then. -Walnuts go kapow (talk) 23:01, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Aberdeen F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.scotprem.premiumtv.co.uk/page/AberdeenDetail/0%2C%2C10002~932190%2C00.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080324091123/http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/2WWfootball.htm to http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/2WWfootball.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.afc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Squad/managers/0%2C%2C10284~976493%2C00.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.afc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/News/clubNewsDetail/0%2C%2C10284~1665990%2C00.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.scotprem.premiumtv.co.uk/page/AberdeenDetail/0%2C%2C10002~907301%2C00.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.afc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Supporters/0%2C%2C10284%2C00.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071228051210/http://www.scotland.org/about/fact-file/population/index.html to http://www.scotland.org/about/fact-file/population/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:21, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I just removed a table added by Omerlaziale a few weeks ago. It seems like an oddly specific dataset for the primary article on the team, and is a copy of data that exists in another, more appropriate article. Is it really worth duplicating that effort here? — fox 21:46, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The intro says that on two occasions Aberdeen avoided relegation on a technicality. That isn't actually true because in one of those seasons (the league expansion season in 99/00) they avoided playing in a relegation playoff on a technicality (which of course is not the same thing as relegation as they could have won this playoff). The article says this correctly later on, but the intro still has this sentence about avoiding relegation on a technicality and should be changed. 58.137.97.2 (talk) 23:51, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a go at making this fairer, while remaining accurate. — fox 00:20, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To User:Crowsus: I'm correcting the list but you are messing in my labor. That's why you see a list twice. My objective no, THE objetive view is that both are titles won and forming part of the honours of the Aberdeen FC as the national that share space with the Cup Winners' Cup. Inside "Honours" they are separated; one in "Regional", the other in "International". Say that "Aberdeen won with reserves" is limitated because The Highland League IS NOT a tournament for reserve teams and for example Aberdeen won the Aberdeenshire Cup 41 times, 3 with the first team and 11 with reserve team... in Brazil for example, Palmeiras won in 1998 the Campeonato Paulista Série A1 with a Reserve Team, that is such if Celtic win the Scot Premiership with their reserves. in Brazil, Palmeiras won in 1998 the Campeonato Paulista Série A1 with a Reserve Team, that is such if Celtic win the Premiership. In 1996 Flamengo won a Conmebol international title (the 1996 Gold Cup) with reserves while playing Brazilian Championship, Campeonato Carioca and Brazilian Cup. In 1993 Sao Paulo FC from Brazil played Brazilian Tournament, Brazilian Cup, South American Super Cup, South American "Recopa", European South-American Cup (in 1992 and 1993), Conmebol Cup and Campeonato Paulista Série A1 were they achieved semifinals with reserve team. But that doesn't make the Paulista Série A1 and Gold Cup a "reserve tournament". A "reserve tournament" is the argentinian "Torneo de Reserva" were plays the reserve teams of all the Argentinian Super League. By the way the Drybrough Cup's information is wrong because was played between season (and is in this article without any scandal) the editions aren't "1979-1980" but "1980" such as the 1983 European Super Cup. Drybrough was played between july and august. Corrected. Angel Millo (no talk) 08:25 08 aug 2018 (UTC)

What is this "if your auntie was your uncle" stuff about? This is just nonsense. Regional trophies should not be in the main article like this, it gives a distorted view of the (un)importance of these trophies to put them on the same pedestal as winning the Scottish national league or cups, or the two European trophies. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 08:52, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is wild. Any objective Scottish football fan looking in would never have heard of the majority of these trophies. I doubt if most Aberdeen fans have FFS. The honours should be for major trophies (League, League Cup, Scottish Cup, Europe) or significant first team trophies. Otherwise some sides (Rangers/Celtic eg) could have 500 'minor' cups listed. Wiki article should give outline, as previously stated if someone wants comprehensive record then they can resarch the history books. CoatbridgeChancellor (talk) 11:31, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rangers and Celtic doesn't "should" but actually have many 'minor' trophies. For being specific they disputed the Glasgow Cup over 100 years with their first teams. We are not talking about the importance of this trophies but about their existence. Wikipedia's labour is to inform about facts from a neutral view and not from what fans "have heard" or they think is important. So this page should be able to inform how many regional titles won by the first time of Aberdeen F.C. to any reader who wants to know. For example me, that I don't care the point of view of a Rangers fan, a Celtic fan nor a scottish fan being someone from other part of the World where regional titles are far more important; therefore, interesting. Angel Millo (talk) 11:47, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Those minor honours are normally listed at subsidiary articles that go into more detail, e.g. List of Aberdeen F.C. records and statistics. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 13:52, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know were are they but... they should be? Or... Why they shouldn't be in the main article? Angel Millo (talk) 09:35, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The logo used in this article is thirteen years out of date. In 2005, two red stars were added to the logo to commemorate Aberdeen's victories in the 1983 European Cup Winners' Cup and European Super Cup, and this new logo can be found here --> [2] FalconJackson (talk) 09:55, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pittodrie stadium capacity78,000 Leyton60 (talk) 18:40, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The figure quoted with a reliable source in the Pittodrie Stadium article is 20,866. --188.30.156.58 (talk) 21:01, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]