This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Freedom of speech Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Anarchism This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism   Anarchism WikiProject open tasks watch · edit · history · talk · purge Recognized content · Drafts & requests · Subscribe · Member list · Resources · How can I help? Did you know 19 Nov 2024 – Anarchism without adjectives (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion Articles for deletion 13 Dec 2024 – Postcolonial anarchism (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion (4 participants) Good article nominees 09 Dec 2024 – Liceu bombing (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst (t · c); start discussion 04 Dec 2024 – Los Solidarios (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst (t · c); start discussion 28 Nov 2024 – Alt Llobregat insurrection (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst (t · c); start discussion Peer reviews 26 Oct 2024 – Lucy Parsons (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Mujinga (t · c); see discussion Requested moves 05 Dec 2024 – 1999 Seattle WTO protests (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to Battle of Seattle by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion 02 Dec 2024 – Sole (hip hop artist) (talk · edit · hist) move request to Sole (hip-hop artist) by SilverLocust (t · c) was moved to Sole (hip-hop artist) (talk · edit · hist); see discussion Articles for creation 13 Dec 2024 – Draft:José de Molina (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by MexicanSoda (t · c) Cleanup (0) · Potentially related articles · Recent edits · Recent Commons images · Stub expansion project (514)

The court membership is incorrect. Brandeis is listed as joining in Holmes' dissent (and my textbook agrees) but he is not listed, as far as I can see, on the court membership. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.101.213.145 (talk) 04:06, 14 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Further, the wiki does not mention Russia at all... The entirety of the case was over U.S presence in Russia.

Brandeis is listed in the membership, and Russia is in the second paragraph, so this is no longer a concern. Corwinlw (talk) 23:45, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have undone RoryReloaded's copyediting inside quotation marks. If this is an actual quotation, it should be left as-is. chrylis (talk) 01:05, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The quotation and edits referenced does not appear in the article at all. Corwinlw (talk) 23:45, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Abrams v. United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080821203459/http://laws.findlaw.com/us/250/616.html to http://laws.findlaw.com/us/250/616.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050911191311/http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org:80/faclibrary/case.aspx?case=Abrams_v_US to http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/faclibrary/case.aspx?case=Abrams_v_US

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:44, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ann Hagedorn's book Savage Peace (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2007) includes two chapters relevant to Abrams v. United States. The first, chapter 6, on pp. 61-79 under the title of "A Mere Slip of a Girl" is a detailed and dramatic account of the trial itself. The second, chapter 37, on pp. 391-403, entitled "Greatness" deals with the dissent of Justice Holmes. She made use of the trial transcript described as follows: Record Group 21, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Criminal Case Files, Archives Box 83, Docket Number C15-23 (the case file is physically located in Lee's Summit, Missouri but can be retrieved via National Archives and Record Administration at 201 Varick Street in NYC in three days). As a matter of interest, Hagedorn gives the much lower figure of $500 as the fine imposed on Mollie Steimer (see page 75 of her book). Menckenire (talk) 17:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]