Talk:Alma Sundquist

Technopedia Center

Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science
S1 Informatics S1 Information Systems S1 Information Technology S1 Computer Engineering S1 Electrical Engineering S1 Civil Engineering

faculty of Economics and Business
S1 Management S1 Accountancy

Faculty of Letters and Educational Sciences
S1 English literature S1 English language education S1 Mathematics education S1 Sports Education

Talk:Alma Sundquist - Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was created or improved during WikiProject Europe's "European 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out!

Alma Sundquist has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 7, 2020. (Reviewed version).

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Red: Stub (2019)

This article was created or improved during the Stub contest hosted by the Women in Red project from October to December 2019. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red

GA Review

GA toolbox
Copyvio detector Authorship External links
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions

This review is transcluded from Talk:Alma Sundquist/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 16:56, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Kingsif, and I'll be doing this review. This is an automated message that helps keep the bot updating the nominated article's talkpage working and allows me to say hi. Feel free to reach out and, if you think the review has gone well, I have some open GA nominations that you could (but are under no obligation to) look at. Kingsif (talk) 16:56, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Sources all good
Infobox good
Images good
History clear
Lead good length, well written, and good overview coverage
Early life and education:
- Is "matriculated from" correct usage?

Changed it to graduated from.

Done SusunW (talk) 19:55, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- Since the subject is Swedish, wouldn't it use the British spelling of 'paediatricians'

I defer such questions to Ipigott, who as a polyglot, works on multiple languages. Perhaps he can weigh in? SusunW (talk) 19:55, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article seems to be more or less in British English, so perhaps we should use "paediatricians". But then "endeavors" would have to be changed to "endeavours".--Ipigott (talk) 11:46, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done SusunW (talk) 13:48, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I feel Career could be split at 'In March 1919', with the subsection heading of 'International' or similar, to break it up a bit and make it seem easier to read

No problem. Split into 2 sections as you requested

Done SusunW (talk) 20:00, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems light on legacy for someone seemingly so influential

Added a sentence. Rather difficult as the Swedish sources we have do not analyze the career, just give an accounting of it. The few sources in English, are very brief. Perhaps Ian can add a bit more here as well? SusunW (talk) 20:22, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Overall

On hold A few things. Kingsif (talk) 19:55, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review Kingsif. Really appreciate your time to do so and to help improve articles. SusunW (talk) 20:22, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll wait on any comments from Ian, but looks good. Kingsif (talk) 00:34, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kingsif, I think we're done, unless you think something else needs work. SusunW (talk) 16:06, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the review. It was a pleasure to work with you on the article. SusunW (talk) 16:51, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Categories: