This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Watches This article is within the scope of WikiProject Watches, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of watches on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WatchesWikipedia:WikiProject WatchesTemplate:WikiProject WatchesWatches articles

I'm quite confused by this article. What makes this term separate from armory practice and/or Interchangeable parts? Can someone convert this article into something more encyclopedic? Or provide references to establish notability? If not, I'm considering WP:PRODing it.

I've deprodded, on the basis that the specific copyright violations alleged have not been specified. And I think it is a notable subject by itself and can be sourced. DGG (talk) 01:21, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, if this can't be improved and sourced I think it should be merged into one of the other articles mentioned above. Plenty of peacock language also. --Chetvorno^TALK 16:09, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Using interchangeable parts is one part of the American System of Watch Manufacturing, but not the whole thing. I'm less confident that it should remain a separate article from the American system of manufacturing (aka armory practics), but I suspect it should be. Watches were the first high-precision product to be mass produced and remained that way for a fair while, hence it created its own area. The article can certainly use a *LOT* of cleanup and expansion, but I don't think it should be merged. Wrs1864 (talk) 16:17, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where's the discussion in this article Henry Pitkin, who made machine-made watches with interchangeable parts at least 10 years before it was done at Waltham? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.1.134.173 (talk) 04:02, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a compendium of many other articles but is unique enough on its own as it applies to the specific field of watch manufacturing. Judged by non historians this may seem insignificant but this was high tech for that period of history and rates its own article. It is like Jet engine development in the mid 20th century which has its own article. I would suggest referencing the other articles in the main part of the article and making this one more brief when the other article covers it much more in depth or vice-versa. Much of Waltham Watches can be merged into this article.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on American system of watch manufacturing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090814164452/http://www.awco.org/Seminar2002/ to http://www.awco.org/Seminar2002/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091012075834/http://www.awco.org/Seminar2002/bostonwatchco.htm to http://www.awco.org/Seminar2002/bostonwatchco.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:33, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1957 Waltham watch case. I read of Waltham going out of business (?) @'57 and that many watches were stopped mid-production and never completed. Are they of any value? Cpearn (talk) 06:27, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]