This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Watches This article is within the scope of WikiProject Watches, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of watches on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WatchesWikipedia:WikiProject WatchesTemplate:WikiProject WatchesWatches articles

After researching a bit online I have this to contribute: Many sources state that indeed the automatic chronograph was first mass produced in 1969[1], so it couldn't have been available for testing by NASA for the 1962 test. I couldn't find any details on the watches offered for the 1972 test, but for the 1979 test, Omega offered 3 watches, amongst which was the 125[2], which is an automatic. So in view of the lack of reliable sources backing the pendulum theory, I'm removing the relevant section. --Ferengi 16:32, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article seems to suggest that Rolex doesn't make manual-wind watches. They do -- they make a line of dress watches called Cellini, and many of those are manual-wind. Ifnkovhg (talk) 23:35, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Armitron is NOT the first company to offer automatic watches under $100. Vostok.(Russia, not Europe), has long offered automatics with.17 to 31 jewel movements for.far under that price. A 31 jewel automatic Amphibia model can.be had for as low as $50 to $60. These are extremely durable watches first designed for military use. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.135.77.209 (talk) 18:59, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Automatic watch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717154247/http://www.undeadlinks.com/s.php?link=http:%2F%2Fwww.bhi.co.uk%2Fhints%2Fautomsp.htm&l=1 to http://www.undeadlinks.com/s.php?link=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bhi.co.uk%2Fhints%2Fautomsp.htm&l=1
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060707215702/http://www.thepurists.com:80/watch/features/8ohms/7s26/ to http://www.thepurists.com/watch/features/8ohms/7s26/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:33, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I previously (about May 2014) added the early history of self-winding watches, but this has been deleted.

Why????

Do we want readers to believe that nothing happened before 1923?

Summerleas (talk) 02:54, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that should be restored. I believe it has been removed several times. Go ahead and put it back. --Chetvorno^TALK 03:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it will be updated a bit.Summerleas (talk) 04:53, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have made the following changes:

Added Early (pocket watch) history.

Added introduction to wristwatch history to link it to the pocket watch history.

Minor changes throughout to match the text with the added history.

^[1]

The note has been retained, but the link has been deleted because it can only be accessed with a password.

^[2]

The reference has been deleted because the links are dead.

^[3]

Despite some of the history being obsolete this reference has been kept. I think it should be deleted or replaced if a better source can be found.

• The History of the Watch Rotor from The Watch Magazine

Deleted this link because the site is dynamic and the article has disappeared. Is there an archived version? Or an alternative article?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Summerleas (talk • contribs) 00:10, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The text correctly states "the hands were moved manually by rotating a bezel around the face of the watch" but obviously that cannot be done with the watch in the photo. Is there a suitable photo that matches the text? Summerleas (talk) 00:18, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I bought a oupinke automatic watch and I accidentally passed this years date how do I put it back to 2022, thanks. 24.237.158.252 (talk) 23:21, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]