A fact from Blue Serpent Clock (Fabergé egg) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 April 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the Blue Serpent Clock Egg is the first Tsar Imperial Fabergé egg to feature a working clock? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/April.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Gemology and Jewelry: Jewelry This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gemology and Jewelry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gemology and JewelryWikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryTemplate:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryGemology and Jewelry ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Jewelry subpage. Russia: Visual arts / History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the visual arts in Russia task force. This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Over the last couple of days an editor (editing under both an IP and username) has repeatedly changed the dates attributed to some of the eggs. The fact that there is discussion over the dates of some of the eggs is included both here on the other pages and is backed up with references.
The proposed dates are only theories and are not universally accepted, however the user is attempting to present them as universally accepted fact. The source he uses to back up his changes even says "Not all Faberge scholars agree with my theory". As I pointed this out to him he has said he will get that website changed. This suggests a COI and also means the "Mieks" Fabergé Eggs website is self-published and can not be considered a reliable source.
As this seemed to be someone new to wikipedia, not familiar with policies regarding neutral point of view etc. etc., I initially was quite gentle. However the editing is increasingly becoming disruptive. The repeated removal of large sections of referenced material, the non neutral presentation of disputed theory as universally accepted fact, the inclusion of unattributed directly copy and pasted material in violation of copyright and now attempts to change an external source in order to back up their claims, are all unacceptable. Its vandalism.

I have contacted the user yet again to warn them about such disruptive editing. Any further attempt to vandalise and disrupt the page should be dealt with severely.

--Rushton2010 (talk) 08:29, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The third imperial egg, ie., the true 1887 egg was recently found. Please update the article to reflect this fact. --rtc (talk) 08:29, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blue Serpent Clock Egg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160527/http://www.wintraecken.nl/mieks/faberge/eggs/1895_Blue_Serpent_Clock_Egg.htm to http://www.wintraecken.nl/mieks/faberge/eggs/1895_Blue_Serpent_Clock_Egg.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:27, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Danish Palaces (Fabergé egg) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:02, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]