Talk:Blue water thesis

Technopedia Center

Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science
S1 Informatics S1 Information Systems S1 Information Technology S1 Computer Engineering S1 Electrical Engineering S1 Civil Engineering

faculty of Economics and Business
S1 Management S1 Accountancy

Faculty of Letters and Educational Sciences
S1 English literature S1 English language education S1 Mathematics education S1 Sports Education

Talk:Blue water thesis - Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Redirected from Talk:Blue Water Thesis)

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 19 March 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Salt water thesis. The result of the discussion was Moved to Blue water thesis.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blue water thesis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130319081054/http://web.uvic.ca/igov/research/pdfs/audrey_roy_thesisfinal.pdf to http://web.uvic.ca/igov/research/pdfs/audrey_roy_thesisfinal.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:13, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 19 March 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Blue water thesis. There is a consensus to lowercase the title, however a lack of consensus to move to the nominated title. – robertsky (talk) 14:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Water Thesis → Salt water thesis – This concept is not consistently capitalized so it should be decapped, whether "blue water" or "salt water" is used. However, while researching it I discovered that "salt water" seems to be slightly more common. (t · c) buidhe 02:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"salt water thesis", 225 results
"blue water thesis", 176 results

(t · c) buidhe 02:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support lowercase MOS:DOCTCAPS would tell us to lowercase this and usage would only confirm this - this ngram,perusal of google scholar results provided by nom and, perusal of JSTOR results (salt water thesis/14 v blue water thesis/20). Considering the various searches, I am not seeing a clear reason to prefer one term over the other. Consequently, I would retain the existing term for the title. Cinderella157 (talk) 01:38, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support lowercase per MOS:CAPS (especially MOS:DOCTCAPS) and the derived WP:NCCAPS. Agreed with Cinderella157 that there's insufficiently conclusive usage evidence to move from "blue" to "salt". — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 09:43, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: It's a concept, theory or doctrine. It is not a proper noun and the research above shows that it is not consistently capitalized in sources. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 13:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per all above. Dicklyon (talk) 02:21, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Categories: