This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chiropractic Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chiropractic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chiropractic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChiropracticWikipedia:WikiProject ChiropracticTemplate:WikiProject ChiropracticChiropractic Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Alternative medicine This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine Skepticism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The BCA v Singh litigation is a disgrace, and they are obviously paranoid to the point of constantly deleting even minor accurate observations on the page, relating to the fact that on the BCA link a quite limited, restricted and unfair quotation of the Singh article is given. I make that point, I make it simply, I do not editorialise on it, and it is a fair point. 202.83.178.94 (talk) 03:50, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have tidied up the references and expanded on this week's coverage in the media. --Oscarthecat (talk) 21:16, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What was the fall-out at BCA as a result of the case? Did any heads roll? Headhitter (talk) 13:13, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This section related only to the Anglo-European College of Chiropractic and the General Chiropractic Council, not to the BCA. I have therefore removed it as not relevant to this article. It could also have given the impression that the BCA is a statutory body, which is as far as I am aware not the case. Brunton (talk) 12:34, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I copied the section to Chiropractic education#United Kingdom, which seems to be the place to talk about regulation. - 2/0 (cont.) 22:37, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on British Chiropractic Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120210004314/http://svetlana14s.narod.ru/Simon_Singhs_silenced_paper.html to http://svetlana14s.narod.ru/Simon_Singhs_silenced_paper.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090613021812/http://richarddawkins.net:80/article,3940,Chiropocalypse,Phil-Plait---BadAstronomy to http://richarddawkins.net/article,3940,Chiropocalypse,Phil-Plait---BadAstronomy

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:22, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British Chiropractic Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100420201251/http://www.elyplace.com:80/index.aspx?p=1 to http://www.elyplace.com/index.aspx?p=1&articleId=208

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:12, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]