Epstein Files Full PDF

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Computer hardware task force. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

They say this is article #1,000,000.

Eh, it's in flux. Melchoir 23:21, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone,' it means just what I choose it to mean, neither more nor less.'

'The question is,' said Alice, 'whether you can make words mean so many different things.'

'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master - that's all.'

--Jscott 23:23, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Cellular architectures are typically very difficult to develop software for" and a little bit later "..makes them particularly difficult to develop for." The wording is exactly the same, any objections to varying it? I'm not sure what to change it to, but it would sound better if the diction were more varied. --Andrewy 02:13, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I don't see a reason to have the first sentence: that idea is just reiterated at the end of the paragraph. I've made a small edit. CecilPL 03:11, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it's preferable to have a continuous subject of a sentence in order to produce cohesion in sentence information. I would change it back.

Please, go back to undergrad school. The cell paradigm was around +50 years ago, go look at some old school cs books.

This article has a red link (Oct 2011) for Concrete programming. AFAIK, what this means is that programmes have immediately obvious results, such as the use of Logo (programming language) to control robots. In context, what is mean seems to be the kind of low-level programming paradigm where, eg., types directly control memory layout. 1Z (talk) 13:07, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cellular architecture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051029210153/http://www.gcn.com:80/20_28/tech-report/17088-1.html to http://www.gcn.com/20_28/tech-report/17088-1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:48, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]