This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article was last assessed in May 2012. Hinduism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Alternative medicine This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

On the topic "Meat as a Medicine" - Charak Samhita talks about thousands of food items on nutrition and diet, but this section specifically refer to meat with special emphasis on feeding under deception. The source referred to is a secondary source when primary authentic source is available. I propose deletion of this selective and derogatory presentation or inclusion of all nutrition and diet items referred in Charak Samhita. Current presentation is non-neutral and avoids available primary authentic source in favor of a secondary must-less unreliable source. --ajaysajay (talk) 04:40, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As @Abecedare noted last year, Debiprasad Chattopadhyaya's writings were sometimes blinkered by his political ideology. See. The review of his books have been mixed, sometimes very critical. He is not the best source for Charaka Samhita and other ancient Indian medical texts, and he should not be the exclusive source for any section/topic in this article. We need to consider him, but together with or prefer additional, recent scholarly secondary and tertiary WP:RS such as Meulenbeld instead. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 08:58, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charaka Samhita. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140911220653/http://sarit.indology.info/newphilo/navigate.pl?indologica.3 to http://sarit.indology.info/newphilo/navigate.pl?indologica.3
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/pagerender.fcgi?artid=1033984&pageindex=1#page

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed this sentence:

The text is based on the Agnivesha Samhitā, an eighth century BCE encyclopedic medical compendium by Agniveśa.

to

The text is based on the Agnivesha Samhitā, an older encyclopedic medical compendium by Agniveśa.

Reason: The date of Agnivesa is dubious. One source cited here says Agnivesha lived in Taxila during Buddha. the page Agnivesha says it is 1500 BCE. So it better to just call it an "older" text. VIBHAATH GUDTROT (talk) 15:08, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I Removed the Category of Religion As Nowhere In Any Source it is Mentioned DeepstoneV (talk) 16:27, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]