Talk:Churchill Barriers

Technopedia Center

Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science
S1 Informatics S1 Information Systems S1 Information Technology S1 Computer Engineering S1 Electrical Engineering S1 Civil Engineering

faculty of Economics and Business
S1 Management S1 Accountancy

Faculty of Letters and Educational Sciences
S1 English literature S1 English language education S1 Mathematics education S1 Sports Education

Talk:Churchill Barriers - Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scottish Islands High‑importance

	Scottish islands portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scottish Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands in Scotland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Scottish IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject Scottish IslandsTemplate:WikiProject Scottish IslandsScottish Islands
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ecological impact

On my last visit to Orkney I spotted a number of otters frolicking under the barriers. Are they known as a wildlife habitat? They must have had some effect on the ecology of Scapa Flow. Deipnosophista 08:17, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's a question I'm also interested in (and that the article didn't answer). In most modern infrastructure projects, such a grave interference with nature would be said to result in the world's demise. No starving fish or other wildlife? No deserted, eroded somethings? --Tim Landscheidt (talk) 15:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a one sentence section citing some Uni of York research which might kick-start things if anyone is more knowledgeable. I know the current conversations regarding the deteriorating state of the barriers has opened up some discussion on replacing the barriers with bridges. Grunners (talk) 12:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Churchill Barriers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090825101636/http://www.orcadian.co.uk/features/articles/prisoners.htm to http://www.orcadian.co.uk/features/articles/prisoners.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:13, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Labour

We know that Brits are not very committed when it comes to addressing their own breaches of wartime customs, be it on Wikipedia or elsewhere, yet it would be worth mentioning that the Italian PoWs who had to build the barrier were abused for military purposes, contrary to the provisions of the Geneva Convention, and that the British government was well aware of this, which is why they declared the undertaking to be "road construction". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.6.16.71 (talk) 10:23, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Categories: