Talk:Coarctation of the aorta

Technopedia Center

Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science
S1 Informatics S1 Information Systems S1 Information Technology S1 Computer Engineering S1 Electrical Engineering S1 Civil Engineering

faculty of Economics and Business
S1 Management S1 Accountancy

Faculty of Letters and Educational Sciences
S1 English literature S1 English language education S1 Mathematics education S1 Sports Education

Talk:Coarctation of the aorta - Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Medicine: Cardiology Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Cardiology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Coarctation of the aorta.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Changed

Changed from two to three types, as in the reference. It also doesn't make sense to say that one position of narrowing is usual in children and another in adults, since this in any case is a congenital defect. --Ekko 08:05, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I still think this is a valid argument. I therefore removed the words again. Couldn't those in favour put forward arguments? --Ekko 20:18, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ekko, I agree that the adult/infantile business doesn't make any sense at all. The article on eMedicine, as well as UpToDate both state that those terms should be abandoned because they are misleading. Instead they just say, "Most coarctations are juxtaductal". But this might be more a clinical viewpoint, rather than a pathological one... frankly, I gave up trying to figure out why it's called adult vs. infantile :P Lemming 16:03, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the reasoning if based on when the coarctation is diagnosed. e.g. is it recognised in children, or normally in later life.Tannim101 (talk) 18:12, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't it be Coarctation of the aorta?

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Result - moved as per MEDMOS, but other arguments have weight, so consensus may change back again in future. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:07, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't it be Coarctation of the aorta? That's what I knew it as...Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:39, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that would be a preferable title, mirroring usage that I'm familiar with. MastCell ^Talk 20:48, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd support the move, I've only ever heard it as the proposition. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 21:54, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why should it be "coarctation of the aorta" again?

Stedman's Medical Dictionary doesn't seem to have a problem with it.[1]
The Mayo Clinic seems to prefer the term coarctation of the aorta but acknowledges the term aortic coarctation.[2]
Google gets more hits with "coarctation of the aorta" (181,000 hits) than "aortic coarctation" (141,000 hits) but PubMed yields the opposite result 7310 items ("aortic coarctation") vs. 3075 items ("coarctation of the aorta").

Personally, I like brevity and simple, e.g. fibular artery over peroneal artery. "Coarctation of the aorta" seems to be a mouth full.

I remember being told when I entered med school "... the questions in medicine don't really change with time-- but the answers do." I'm thinking what you learned has been changing... Nephron T|C 04:20, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting points. Brevity is good, this combination just sounds odd as I had never seen it before coming across this article. Been a while since I was in med school. No cardiologists among us, are there? Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:52, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but my memories from medical school should take preference over those "medical dictionaries" and the "Mayo clinic". :) Or not. OK, I'm fine with whatever, and I learned something. That's what you get for listening to a psychiatrist and a House watcher. :) MastCell ^Talk 17:37, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MeSH prefers "aortic coarctation", but ICD-10 prefers "coarctation of aorta", so per MEDMOS, we should probably go with the latter. --Arcadian (talk) 19:51, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aha, well that's that then I guess - MEDMOS via ICD-10. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:03, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Stenosis of the aortic isthmus / Aortic isthmus stenosis / etc.

If these terms are synonyms for coarctation of the aorta, then this article should mention them as such, and redirect pages should be created for them. If not, perhaps an article should be written about this. Thomas.Hedden (talk) 23:44, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

it isnt the same thing, but i think it would be useful for this to have its own page.Tannim101 (talk) 18:18, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Risk factors for identification on prenatal ultrasound

doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024068 JFW | T@lk 09:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Coarctation of the aorta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:48, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Categories: