Talk:Defense Threat Reduction Agency

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Organizations Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Science Policy Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lack of History

This article has no history on either the Defense Nuclear Agency or the Defense Special Weapons Agency that preceded DTRA - in fact, it has zero pre-Cold War history - but pages for those agencies redirect back here. Either these agencies need separate pages, or the DTRA article must be greatly expanded. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.180.229.244 (talk) 00:20, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DTRA has published a rather large historical document on its website. On page 404 of the PDF begins an appendix with charters of its predecessor organizations. This is probably the most complete history you can find on any of those organizations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.163.114.163 (talk) 20:19, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

I marked this page for cleanup because the article repeats itself over and over again. It looks like 5 people tried to write the article and just decided to include all 5 versions one after another. For starters, maybe the missions statement should only be quoted once?

I am moving tangentially related material about the Defense Enterprise Fund (DEF) to it's own article page and cleaning that information up. The DEF has an interesting history, but it is a separate issue. The information provided also seems to come from two sources: the official Dept. of Defense Inspector General reports, which meet Wikipedia's standard of verifiable, reliable outside sources; and unverifiable original research written by the individual that edited the Wikipedia article (portions of the entry are copied verbatim from his own blog entries^[1] and clearly violates the rules set out on the Wikipedia:No_original_research article that states: "Do not add unsourced material from your personal experience, because that would make Wikipedia a primary source of that material." -User:Danisteg 13:59, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Maly, Matthew. "When You Hear Them Talk About the Danger of Nuclear War, Remember Me". Columbia You. Columbia Alumni Association. Retrieved 15 May 2017.

Issues

DTRA was formed by combining some DoD agencies, including the Defense Special Weapons Agency. DSWA was a successor to the Defense Nuclear Agency. So, DNA did have a Cold War mission. DNA changed their name to DSWA, which was then assimilated into DTRA. Hope this helps - I'll change the page accordingly. - new user, 20 March 2006

The Defense Threat Reduction Agency came into being in 1998. This means that it did not have a mission during the Cold War. It was formed from previous agencies, some of which did have such missions. Its history should be expanded. I will be revising this article shortly to be consistent with the DTRA web page. Robert McClenon 16:52, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Good that we have someone with knowledge about this. Mine was simply stories ands tuff that I was told by other people. Best of luck with the expansion. -Husnock 20:50, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced material

I am archiving unsourced statements to this page. Robert McClenon 16:54, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rumors also exist that the Defense Threat Reduction Agency maintains invasion plans for Canada and Mexico, should either of those countries destabilize into a government unfriendly or hostile to the United States.

It looks like it wasnt these guys, as you say, but I wonder who? There are actually such plans in existence, as the old War Plans Division of the War Department was in charge of invasion plans for everywhere from Canada, Mexico, and England. I wonder who inherited the job? -Husnock 20:50, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It is my understanding that these plans exist. I have no idea who maintains them. I had not known until now that DTRA was one of various US agencies about whom there were conspiracy theories. (Conspiracies do exist, but most theories about them are nonsense. Some of them are true, but most are not.) Robert McClenon 02:08, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The sole purpose of DTRA is to reduce the threat of the spread of WMD, but I can see how the vague concept of "Threat Reduction" could be tied into some nonsensical conspiracy theory. It's sort of like how "UFOlogists" latched onto the Foreign Technology Division of the USAF as being in contact with alleged aliens despite the fact that FTD's mission was interfacing with intercepted technologies from foreign countries like USSR, China, etc. Conspiracy theorists need to get a grip - the military is really not that creative, it is a blunt instrument designed for blunt purposes. Go fantasize about the CIA or the State Department if you're into conspiracy.

Here's the thing. EVERY country has invasion plans for their neighbors. It's sensible strategy, and you'd best believe that your neighbor has a plan for how to react when you lose control of it all to an intolerable cult or worse. If anyone in DoD has these plans, my money would be on the Office of Net Assessment. They have the crown of crowns for all DoD strategy and policy when it comes to the future. Even that could be wrong, though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.163.114.163 (talk) 19:31, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

I think that I accidentally snipped the opening paragraph when snipping the accuracy banner. Thank you for restoring it. Robert McClenon 00:13, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Defense Threat Reduction Agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:26, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.vance.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123433152%2F
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110611111956/http://www.dtra.mil/documents/aboutdtra/DefensesNuclearAgency.pdf to http://www.dtra.mil/documents/aboutdtra/DefensesNuclearAgency.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:57, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Categories:

Hidden categories: