This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Disability Disability and disasters is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles Disaster management Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Autism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Law This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 January 2022 and 11 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Vmc24, Jwendt22, Arcy3000, Kcleary217 (article contribs).

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Disability and disasters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130512111637/http://cdra.colostate.edu/Data/Sites/1/cdra-research/peek-stough2010.pdf to http://cdra.colostate.edu/Data/Sites/1/cdra-research/peek-stough2010.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130202131058/http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=1546 to https://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=1546
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://practicalaction.org/janthakshana_disabilitysensitivity
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120908082804/http://www.handicap-international.fr/fileadmin/documents/publications/DisasterRiskReduc.pdf to http://www.handicap-international.fr/fileadmin/documents/publications/DisasterRiskReduc.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discrimination section of the article needs a more neutral tone. It seems as if there is a "call to action" occurring, specifically in the last few sentences. Vmc24 (talk) 22:34, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vmc24 I found and removed two "conclusion/recommendation" sentences which I think goes some way to improving the article. I agree the tone could be better. My rule of thumb for improving encyclopedic tone is "kill all the adjectives" - keep only those you can justify. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source 7 comes from a book and is particularly difficult to access. It is not free to access the book, so it may not be a great source for the article.Vmc24 (talk) 22:38, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vmc24 A PDF copy of the chapter is available at https://www.academia.edu/9413481/Choosing_agency_in_the_midst_of_vulnerability_Using_critical_disability_theory_to_examine_a_disaster_narrative -- Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:57, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vmc24 Jwendt22 Arcy3000 Kcleary217 Take a look at these news articles:

• Booth, Robert (6 May 2021). "Grenfell landlord 'did not create escape plans for disabled residents' | Grenfell Tower inquiry | The Guardian". The Guardian. Retrieved 10 April 2022.
• "Grenfell Tower fire is 'a landmark act of discrimination against disabled and vulnerable people' | Disability Rights UK". www.disabilityrightsuk.org. 22 April 2021. Retrieved 10 April 2022.
• Apps, Peter (8 September 2021). "Failure to identify disabled Grenfell Tower residents before fire 'not acceptable', inquiry hears". Inside Housing. Retrieved 10 April 2022.
• "Disabled Grenfell residents 'had no escape route'". BBC News. 20 April 2021. Retrieved 10 April 2022.

I think they could be used to improve this article. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:14, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I added more to the lead section with two new references. Vmc24 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 20:23, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I just made my first ever Wikipedia edit here for the Fall 2023 #CiteNLM. I added the PAHO source (https://www.paho.org/en/news/6-12-2018-disability-inclusion-hospital-disaster-risk-management-ingrid-h). I am pretty sure this is a Wikipedia-approved source and that I added the information correctly. However, if you notice any issues with it, I am really open to feedback! Fugeww40 (talk) 20:52, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]