Epstein Files Full PDF

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

I certainly think this is notable enough for Wikipedia. I found the article after questioning a line in the GNU 'coreutils' documentation, and it answered the questions. Gordon Findlay (talk) 07:24, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. As the person who created this article, I was going to suggest merging it somewhere else, but it turns out there is no good place to merge it into at present. The Solaris article does not give any detail about Solaris features; all it has (under "Version history") is a single sentence with links to several articles:

Notable features of Solaris currently include DTrace, Doors, Service Management Facility, Solaris Containers, Solaris Multiplexed I/O, Solaris Volume Manager, ZFS, and Solaris Trusted Extensions.

This seems to me to be a good way to organize things. All but 2 of those articles (this one and Solaris Multiplexed I/O) are reasonably long, especially DTrace, ZFS and SMF (all of which should have longish articles). The Multiplexed I/O article is currently too short (and is tagged for expert help).

(The alternative would be to create a list article, say List of Solaris operating system features, in which (for example) the DTrace section would consist of "See main article: DTrace". We could merge the shorter articles from the above list there; those articles would become WP:Redirects into the list article. I prefer the current approach.)

So I agree that we should keep this article, at least for now.

Cheers, CWC 10:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably the person questioning the notability of a memory block IPC mechanism with two separate implementations is not a computer scientist, more likely a theater critic or Windows zealot.  :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.153.183.229 (talk) 14:12, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Doors (computing). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121022135943/https://blogs.oracle.com/meem/entry/head_title_dsvclockd_1m_using to https://blogs.oracle.com/meem/entry/head_title_dsvclockd_1m_using

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:31, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]