This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

UK geography This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. England This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I've had to take the step of rewriting a lot of this article as it was becoming nonsense.

Please don't do any reverting unless you are sure your facts are correct. I will try and keep an eye on this article to stop it straying away to junk again... It's critical that wikipedia is accurate in places, or at least accurate enough that the casual observer cannot see through the nonsense

-- rant over --- --Davelane 00:09, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

PS -- please correct my typos however :)

As it is, I think it is excellent. Well done. Dieter Simon 22:55, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Why did you change the southern England chalk formation from singular to plural? As I understand it the different downs are all part of the same formation, folding followed by erosion of some of the domes and creation of valleys and vales have led it being divided into the separately named downs. --Joe D (t) 23:16, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC) (P.S., to sign your name you need ~~~~, not ----.)

Ok, thanks for the improvements -- yeah sorry about the username typo I keep doing that because the insert Tags are broken in Konqueror :( erm I see what you mean about the chalk formation(s) and I can't decide to revert my edit or not -- It makes equal sense either way, but Downs being kind of plural it seems to be easier on the reader tho technically less correct in a geological kind of way -- I was thinking of creating an separate article on the south UK downland, which could go into more depth -- theres some good stuff in the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica in Downs which could be used for this.

--Davelane 00:09, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I've also thought about a general article on this particular formation, as I've found (and written) in a number of articles on specific areas of downs a list of the other downs in the formation, and replacing the text "this downland is part of the chalk formation that includes the Dorset Downs, Salisbury Plain, Isle of Wight, South Downs" etc etc with "this downland is part of the Southern England Chalk Formation might be one of the many benefits of such an article. I've also noticed the articles Chalk, Downland and Chalk Formation aren't quite as tied together as they could be. Joe D (t) 00:28, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Ok I vote for that -- however is there a Geology_of_the_United_Kingdom#Cretaceous_period and Chalk Formation which together skim round the whole subject. Lets create the Southern England Chalk Formation as you suggest and populate it with the 1911 Britannica page on Downs and move some of the stuff around mentioned above oh and we should also include the Weald... --Davelane 00:58, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Yes, as I said in the "White Cliffs" talk, I apologise. I should have known better, they are at the end of the "North Downs Way". Dieter Simon 23:16, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Are the Seven Sisters/South Downs links really relevant here? This article is about download in general, these links should probably go on South Downs page. If nobody objects I might get 'round to deleting them somewhen... Joe D (t) 00:03, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, have removed external links and added to Seven Sisters article.

Dieter Simon 01:51, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed Watership Down and Eastbourne from the South Downs. Watership Down is between Basingstoke and Newbury, and well to the north of the South Downs. Eastbourne is a town which lies mostly below the eastern end of the South Downs. Instead, I have added Butser Hill and Ditchling Beacon to the examples of parts of the South Downs.

Also, I've added Box Hill as a further example of a place on the North Downs.

--Portnadler 16:16, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Are you certain that 'dun' is Germanic or Norse? I am German and the main german words for hill ist 'Huegel' (Buehl, Biehl, Bichel). 'dun' rather relates to the celtic 'dún', which denotes a hill fortification. The word dune also probably comes from this root.--46.223.7.40 (talk) 20:37, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(new comment (that I don't know whwere else to put): isn't the word "downs" also culturally specific to England/UK etc? It's written as if the word "downs" is used worldwide for upland chalk formations. Rob — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.212.18.130 (talk) 17:53, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(comment 18-Oct-2016) Where I live on the Isle of Wight, we have chalk downlands. Yes, '... Down' is used a lot these days to refer to a hilltop, but I have seen old maps where (eg) the north face of the 'down' has the name of the village that it overlooks and the south face has another name of the village that It overlooks. Older OS maps have some downland names on the slope, rather than on the hilltop. It has been suggested to me that long-distance tracks went along the hill ridges and the traveller went 'down' to his destination village. I don't suppose this will ever be sorted out for sure..... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.64.233.64 (talk) 13:06, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Downland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050228121727/http://www.ukbap.org.uk:80/ukplans.aspx?ID=12 to http://www.ukbap.org.uk/UKPlans.aspx?ID=12#1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:52, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Downland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ukbap.org.uk/ukplans.aspx?ID=12
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.southdownsonline.org/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080315040741/http://www.countryside.gov.uk/LAR/Landscape/CC/SEL/salisbury_plain_and_west_wiltshire_downs.asp to http://www.countryside.gov.uk/LAR/Landscape/CC/SEL/salisbury_plain_and_west_wiltshire_downs.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:01, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger of the articles now complete. There are more footnotes now, but even more would be good. The habitat section could probably do with more work. Mikenorton (talk) 20:48, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User Spinningspark who sadly has passed away had requested Wikipedia:Graphics_Lab/Map_workshop#Topographical_map_of_southern_England a map of the Downland and I have worked on it. We were as good as finished when I learned he passed away but Chipmunkdavis helped me with the last part and it's now uploaded and you can find it here Downland in southern England. Please check the information on it as it is what I have found without any knowledge of this, thanks. --always ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 16:33, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]