This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Psychology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Medicine: Psychiatry Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force. Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I am unable to find the short story by Joshua Ostrander referred to in the "Erotomania in Fiction" section. Could someone provide the publication info?

Doesn't sound rare to me. Maybe i'm rare. Where could a person get this published paper? --Cyberman 02:11, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hmm. de Clérambault (e acute) or de Clerambault (just e)? When there is an accent, most sources have the acute accent. However, most sources don't have the accent, including most French ones. Can any native French speakers help out? -- Karada

English sites that bother spell out his entire name, Gaëtan Gatian de Clerambault, never seem to use an é, even though they go to all the effort of making sure they have the ë in his first name. But French ones seem to be about 50:50. So what is correct? -- Karada

Hmmm... sounds to me like the accented one is a misspelling.

Re Les psychoses passionelles - a proper cite appears to be:

• De Clerambault, G. "Les psychoses passionelles" (1921). Ouvre Psychiatrique. Paris, Press Universitaires de France, 1942.

That is to say, he wrote it in 1921, and it was printed in a book published in 1942. (Note that de Clerambault committed suicide in 1934.)

In the style of other articles about disorders, this could mention the source of the term (Greek? Latin?). PeepP 18:43, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

Ian McEwan has admitted that he made all this up - see for instance - Fooled You Guardian article I suggest that this article should be clearly signposted as such ! -footie 23:41, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

McEwan made up the fake article in the back of the novel Enduring Love, but the condition itself is indeed real and has been discussed widely in the medical literature (as the references show) and is listed in the DSM.

I finished reading'Enduring Love' this Mornin and although I am now the age when my mother was suffering her delusions, it is the first time in my life that I have heard of her madness [ that is how I always referred to it as a then teenager]having a name and a diagnosis. It began when she was 41years old and endured to her death at 59. She was married twice, had children with both men, yet it came upon her suddenly. I met the object of her passion- once on my father's request and once on hers. A miserable business. Is there any evidence to suggest that erotomania can be genetically inherited? My sister and I are obviously interested in this.

- Vaughan 07:36, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By definition, the eponymous "liar" is not deluded, he is simply lying, exaggerating his sexual prowess with famous women for self-aggrandizement, not because he is psychotically deluded about the true nature of his relationship with the women in question, he is instead pathologically inclined to lie and tell grandiose stories to impress others. As amusing as Lovitz' portrayal is, it is manifestly not a case of erotomania, which would change the entire premise of the character and the comedy bit in question.

Therefore, I have removed it. 71.100.167.23 (talk) 06:28, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ie, the delusional belief that someone is in love with you. It may or may not be the case that you also are in love with this other person.

I came down with this condition suddenly in the middle of my school year and had to drop out because of it. In my case, I did NOT want the attention I thought I was getting from strangers. It was a terrible, bizarre, and traumatic experience. 207.237.41.202 (talk) 09:20, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, who hasn't thought at some point that someone liked them but it wasn't true? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.161.205.151 (talk) 22:34, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As someone who has both experienced the sense of someone else possibly liking you (normal state) AND a delusional psychosis (crazay state), I can tell you the two are completely different in magnitude and in characteristic. 207.237.41.202 (talk) 11:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think it is a disorder many have thought a person loved them but it was not the case.sometimes the person is insecure so they like the affection from the person but does not like whom the person is the person brakes the others heart to make himself feel better--Sweetheart2009 (talk) 22:11, 5 July 2009 (UTC)sweetheart2009[reply]

The situation that you have just described is not a disorder. Erotomania, however, is a rare type of psychosis. Roastporkbun (talk) 17:03, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Believe me. It's real. It wrecks lives, mostly those of the affected person's family. And it vanishes as suddenly as it comes. --Bluejay Young (talk) 09:53, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What if someone delusionally believed someone was in love with them, but didn't feel in love back to that person and so started sending them letters telling them to leave them alone? Is that still Erotomania.

Alternatively what if they don't think the person is in love with them, but they don't care because they believe if they send the person letters and act in love with the person then the person will become in love with them?

According to several second definitions found at the site listed below, erotomania can be a form of hypersexuality. http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Erotomanic 70.245.212.70 (talk) 18:04, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is erotomania comorbid with personality disorders? If so, which ones? Jim Michael (talk) 12:03, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Erotomania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110614045329/http://www.onlineathens.com/1998/101198/1011.a3letterman.html to http://www.onlineathens.com/1998/101198/1011.a3letterman.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:13, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't made any change to the article, but as a psychologist I'd like to point out a error (that probably won't make much difference to most readers): Glenn Close's character in Fatal Attraction did NOT exhibit erotomania. She exhibited borderline personality disorder, with probably features of some other disorders as well (paranoia, anxiety, depression, etc.). Erotomania would require the delusional belief that Michael Douglas' character was in love with her. She was quite aware that he wanted nothing more to do with her -- she just wasn't going to take "no" for an answer. Her BPD drove her to stalk him and escalate her revenge against him and his family. But she did not labor under the delusion that he had a burning desire for her. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8807:4080:10C:C0D2:5438:5ED7:CD4C (talk) 01:22, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, the subject of the Glenn Close character's attraction initially did reciprocate and they had a consensual sexual relationship. If having a consensual sexual relationship precludes a diagnosis of erotomania, then referencing Fatal Attraction is inappropriate for this article. 70.179.156.242 (talk) 21:20, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just gone to add the ICD-10 code F52.7, but it classifies "excessive sexual drive" – this doesn't seem to tally with the article. I'm not sure if it's a case of the ICD being out-of-step with the DSM, my being a lay-reader, or something else. So thought I'd post first before blindly adding the ICD-10 code. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) Little pob (talk) 17:59, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this scientific article prominently illustrated with an image from a 19th century book of pseudoscience? It is not respectful of people suffering with this disorder, instead reinforcing stereotypes of “crazy people”. ScottMainwaring (talk) 16:41, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed it as likely misleading. Crossroads ^-talk- 04:07, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]