Talk:Evangelists of the Worldwide Church of God

Technopedia Center

Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science
S1 Informatics S1 Information Systems S1 Information Technology S1 Computer Engineering S1 Electrical Engineering S1 Civil Engineering

faculty of Economics and Business
S1 Management S1 Accountancy

Faculty of Letters and Educational Sciences
S1 English literature S1 English language education S1 Mathematics education S1 Sports Education

Talk:Evangelists of the Worldwide Church of God - Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion: New religious movements Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.gci.org/. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 04:40, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gerald Waterhouse

I edited a section about his reasons for changing affiliations.

Originally it accused him of "..abandoning the Church to which he pledged loyalty no matter what". In reality this is not accurate. The belief is that "the Church" is NOT constituted by a legal organizational name in strictest terms. But that "the Church" is a group of people who share (basically) the same ideas and views as laid out in the Bible. "The Church" today is Spiritual Israel, and bound by the laws God gave to all Israel. This means obedience to God's laws, and Holy days, as laid out by Him, for all generations (Leviticus 23) are a shared belief.

When WCG made massive doctrinal changes turning away from these beliefs, it was no longer "the Church", as hundreds of thousands of people left to form other groups. The basic principles that WCG now taught were so drastically different that one would have to go completely against his own teaching to stay. As a result, Mr. Waterhouse left, not to show disloyalty, but to attempt to show loyalty to what he believed was the right teaching about God.

If I steer my car into oncoming traffic, and my passengers all jump out, can I count them disloyal for not hanging around for imminent wreck? Were they showing disloyalty, or were they trying to preserve themselves and do what was right? (Bad analogy perhaps, they all break down at some point, still, you get the point lol). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.234.90.241 (talk) 03:42, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories: