This article is within the scope of WikiProject Secret Societies, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Secret SocietiesWikipedia:WikiProject Secret SocietiesTemplate:WikiProject Secret SocietiesSecret Societies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
This article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Yes, the earliest Masonic “Grand” body in France was called the “Grand Lodge of France”... but the current GLF is a later revival (dating to 1894). The Grand Orient has been in existence for a longer time, and thus has a legitimate claim to being the “oldest”. I do understand that GLF claims direct descent from the original, but so does GOF. Who is “older” isn’t clear cut. So... I think it best to simply omit this claim (ie not mention the issue “oldest” at all). Please discuss. Blueboar (talk) 17:31, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I came from the noticeboard. Blueboar is right. If there is no source for the claim about oldest it shouldn't be in the article.ImTheIP (talk) 19:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]