This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Systems Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is within the field of Control theory. Military history: Technology This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force Technology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Say German V-1 _rocket_/_bomb_/_submarine_ or something. --Jidanni 2006-04-15

Cruise missile in today terms. Why not to read the V-1 flying bomb article (found via "Go/Search" box)? BTW, "V-1" is a propaganda name, while the "native" one is Fi-103. --jno 07:42, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Offline users would have to reconnect to read an additional article, just to find out one extra word describing what a V-1 was. They might be in a tent far away from a connection. --User:Jidanni 2006-04-20

Much earlier than the guidance system of the V1 were the gyroscopic stabilized torpedo guirdance systems. The first systems were developed in late 19th century only stabilizing the straighness of shots. True guidance systems allowing to programm simple courses were invented in Germany for use in torpedoes 1942 (so called LUT). Even earlier than the V1.--WerWil (talk) 18:41, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Made several modifications to delineate the difference between guidance and navigation. Prior to revisions much focus was placed upon military missile "guidance". Perhaps a new section on military applications is appropriate with missile types. I've probably been a little too robust in the history section, but since I know many of these folks I can't believe this hasn't been better documented. My understanding of the JPL crew is very limited.. so I know there there must be some tremendous additions waiting to come. Corrected errors in previous version relating to Optical guidance (now correct in TERCOM which has a separate Wiki entry). This is my first effort so sorry if my references are not in correct format. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xs4-guy (talk • contribs) 19:48, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Inertial navigation systems were originally developed for rockets.

This is still not correct. First gyroscopic systems were developed for Torpedoes.--WerWil (talk) 17:09, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fortunately Von Braun engineered the surrender of 500 of his top rocket scientists, along with plans and test vehicles, to the Americans. Fortunately for whom? For the Americans?

Here's what i removed:

Mathematical foundations to today's guidance problems can be found in An Introduction to the Mathematics and Methods of Astrodynamics, Revised Edition (Aiaa Education Series) Richard Battin 1991.

--TiagoTiago (talk) 03:33, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article lacks recent advances in guidance systems, e.g. the execution of complex track patterns for search-and-rescue tasks that are available in current manned and unmanned systems.

Shall this be included?

Johann.Uhrmann (talk) 06:41, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guidance system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130817172206/http://astronautix.com/astros/vonbraun.htm to http://www.astronautix.com/astros/vonbraun.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:53, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]