This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Canadian / German / American This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force. This article is supported by the German cinema task force. This article is supported by the American cinema task force. Video games Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks: Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks view watch edit history shell vg talk alerts purge AfDs SMART Commute Fleet (OMSI 2) (2 participants) Red Barrels (0 participants) The Campaign Trail (Web Game) (23 participants) Paper doll (video games) (3 participants) TheoTown (10 participants) Redout (video game) (11 participants) Old Grandma Hardcore (5 participants) WePlay AniMajor (2 participants; relisted) İstanbul Efsaneleri: Lale Savaşçıları (3 participants; relisted) Zero Hour (video game) (5 participants; relisted) Merge discussions Console game (discussion) Atari Interactive (discussion) Nintendo DS Lite (discussion) Freedom Town, USA (discussion) Pokémon Essentials (discussion) Harvest Moon DS: Sunshine Islands (discussion) Input lag (discussion) Neo Geo Pocket (discussion) Minecraft – Volume Beta (discussion) Other discussions No major discussions Featured content candidates Donkey Kong (nom) Hotline Miami (nom) The Suicide of Rachel Foster (nom) Bejeweled (video game) (nom) Good article nominations Miner 2049er (nom) Pixel Piracy (start) River Raid (start) The Great Giana Sisters (nom) Haunter (Pokémon) (start) Dendy (start) Dark Urge (start) Jeanette Voerman (start) Deathloop (start) Quiver (video game) (start) Regi (Pokémon) (start) Ridley (Metroid) (start) Blast Wind (start) Project Zero 2: Wii Edition (start) Barry Burton (start) Sea of Stars (start) Pokémon Smile (start) Pokémon Stadium (start) Otogirisō (start) Schim (start) Bit Pilot (start) OK Golf (nom) Tom Clancy's The Division 2 (start) Unsighted (start) Gardevoir (start) Cybermania '94 (start) DYK nominations Sun Haven Reviews and reassessments A Space for the Unbound (rev) Bejeweled (video game) (rev) The Legend of Dragoon (rev) The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past (nom) Appy Awards Articles that need... assessment (0) (0) reassessment (0) cleanup (3) infoboxes (12) cover art (246) screenshots (8,965) photos (70) translation from japan (187) creation merging

It appears they filmed the movie close to the municipality of Sooke, British Columbia, Canada. I grew up in this city, but I never heard they were filming the movie. *crossing fingers* Hope it'll be worth it.Gr1phOTR (talk) 10:18, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, this movie's been in the works for, what, a year now, to my knowledge its done and the most specific release date is August 2007. Isn't there anyway to find out the actual date at which the movie will be realeased, or at least in what parts of the world. Also, Bolls's apparently coming out with two films this spring (busy guy) and there are no release dates for those either, except that BloodRayne II's coming out sometime this month.

Why all this ambiguity with the release dates? -TheHande 08:05, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Imdb has the january 18th release date. Why don't we just use that? That seems better than listing two conflicting release dates.--Shadowdrak 02:40, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a plot synopsis! It sounds like it's taken straight off the back of the box. Can someone who has actually seen the movie edit this article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.95.18.157 (talk) 15:36, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen this movie (unfortunately) and trust me what's written is about as coherent of a plot as you get. Stormwysper (talk) 19:28, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I tried improving the plot synopsis. -TheHande (talk) 14:52, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty tough to polish a turd DFS (talk) 21:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, but I tried to make it more... complete. It may not have helped coherence though. Nineran (talk) 05:35, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The major problem is the writing. As if the writer is not natural born in to the English language. Poorly done, no less. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.40.54.48 (talk) 19:24, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you happen to be "natural born in to the English language", then feel free to amend the section where it needs improvement. I personally find that its writing and rewriting deserves more appreciation, on the contrary.--90.96.24.138 (talk) 20:17, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Completely rewritten plot summary: It is written to present the concept less than its layout, and I'm a little worried it might lead people to expect the movie to start with a flashback to the Battle of Oxley Pass. I don't think this is a problem, but feel free to change it if you disagree. I removed the plot length tag placed by Friekorp since it now fits the guidelines. Please check it over for errors, but I'll come back in a few days after my head is clear. Too bad it fared so poorly, I really like this movie (except for those repetitive glamor shots of Farmer slashing Gallian all the time...) Featherwinglove (talk) 03:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on In the Name of the King. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080117230637/http://www.bloody-disgusting.com:80/index.php?Show=5550 to http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/index.php?Show=5550&Template=newsfull

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on In the Name of the King. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071130040627/http://www.blind-guardian.com/new_version/popups/news.php3?news_id=283 to http://www.blind-guardian.com/new_version/popups/news.php3?news_id=283
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080201074547/http://www.movieset.com/inthenameoftheking to http://www.movieset.com/inthenameoftheking

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:57, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]