This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Infrastructure article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
Public infrastructure was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 13 May 2024 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Infrastructure. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of History of infrastructure#History of the term infrastructure was copied or moved into Infrastructure with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Infrastructure_and_economics#Ownership_and_financing_of_infrastructure was copied or moved into Infrastructure with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This level-3 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Infrastructure:
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Untitled
I'm not quite sure where those last two I added (mail and money) fit in best; it could be argued that mail ought to got under services, or under transportation; similarly, money could go under services or utilities. -- John Owens 11:09 Apr 4, 2003 (UTC)
OED suggests that the term can be defined quite broadly as "the collective term for the subordinate parts of an undertaking", which leaves the definition wide open. The definitions presented here seem more based on a feeling about what should fit in. In flood risk management people refer to flood defences as "infrastructure". As the subordinate parts of a flood risk mitigation undertaking this would seem to have some validity. I got here from a discussion about whether, in that context, "soft" defence measures such as land use management and tree planting qualify as infrastructure. -- Hamish Harvey
I am working in FEMA's ESF #14 Long Term Community Recover...more specifically, in the Environmental/Infrastructure section. I was wondering how the term infrastructure applies to long term community recovery. If it is in the sense of sewer and waterlines, then I believe that you can't have those lines run effictevly, an effective and efficent infrastructure, without money...or funding. The question I have, is the funding of such systems considered infrastructure? Cassidy
Split article
We should really separate out physical infrastructure (economics, urban planning, etc) from the other stuff ... whatever that is. This mush of an article doesn't encourage expansion of either.Rd232 1 July 2005 12:48 (UTC) f
Jingel
Interesting website. Love the definitions and layered links to subjects. Infrastructure is of particular interest to me as I publish ReNew Canada - The Infrastructure Renewal Magazine (www.renewcanada.net).
typos and errors and overall poor writing
This:
"Most infrastructure is designed by civil engineers, except for telecommunications, electricity and monitoring networks, that are designed mainly by electrical engineers."
is inaccurate and written poorly.
Telecommunications networks, especially inter-networks, are designed by network engineers, not EE's. "Monitoring Networks" has a vague definition here but if you're talking about computer networks, monitoring networks are generally designed by systems engineers or simply, "programmers".
I would absolutely love to edit this article in detail and make it more grammatically correct but unfortunately I don't have the time to do so.
Otherwise I think it's looking pretty good. Decent read. Thanks.
Brevity, breadth and inclusion
"Infrastructure owners must provide access on terms and conditions that do not discriminate on the basis of the user or use." - Brett Frischmann
It is defined by the duties and obligations of its owners. If we wish to remove discrimination, we must correctly identify the infrastructures and provide them. When such capital goods are identified, then they become infrastructure. Nothing competed is infrastructure, no level of global but transient network effects are sufficient.
Wiki Education assignment: Engineering in the 21st Century - Section 002
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 August 2024 and 3 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): E102RealGroup11 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Mbhalla06, Group 6 E102 2024, Jabakah, TheEngineers115, E102Group7.
— Assignment last updated by Mbhalla06 (talk) 21:20, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
CS
What are the technology in uses on the infrastructure 36.37.152.146 (talk) 08:26, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class level-3 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-3 vital articles in Technology
- C-Class vital articles in Technology
- C-Class Urban studies and planning articles
- Top-importance Urban studies and planning articles
- C-Class Engineering articles
- High-importance Engineering articles
- WikiProject Engineering articles
- C-Class Economics articles
- High-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists