This article was nominated for deletion on 8 March 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Religion: Interfaith This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive. Christianity: Texts / Catholicism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Religious texts (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Mid-importance). Freemasonry Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. ◆  WikiProject Freemasonry's "Top of the Trestleboard": Improve to Featured Article status Freemasonry Tracing board Isaac Newton University Lodge Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia Operative Masonry Primitive Scottish Rite Add content to stubs… Check recently changed articles for possible improvement, to remove vandalism, etc. Requests [Watch this list] Articles for all United Grand Lodge of England-recognized Grand Lodges (if notable) Participate in articles listed for deletion Need images Scottish Rite York Rite Sovereign Grand Lodge of Malta New Article to be created Adonhiramite Rite Portuguese Rite Brazilian Rite Irish Rite Moorish Rite Rite Français Moderne Rétabli

I've taken this text out of the article:

*[[Leo XIII]] awarded a gold medal [http://www.wings.buffalo.edu/aru/preprohibition.htm] to a fashionable [[19th century]] [[cocaine]]-laced wine called ''[[Vin Mariani]]''. <ref> [[Paolo Mantegazza]] a prominent [[Italy|Italian]] [[neurology|neurologist]], [[physiologist]] and [[anthropologist]], isolatied of [[cocaine]] from [[coca]] leaves and experimentally tested it on himself in 1859. Afterwards, he wrote a paper titled ''Sulle Virtù Igieniche e Medicinali della Coca e sugli Alimenti Nervosi in Generale'' ("On the hygienic and medicinal properties of coca and on nervous nourishment in general"). described the effect of cocaine on [[cognition]]. </ref>

It's already in the Talk:Pope_Leo_XIII, which is where it belongs.

If it is relevant to the article then by all means show how.

JASpencer 19:47, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Again I ask is this relevant to the article? Please state the case? JASpencer 09:59, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As there is no response, I take it that this can be removed. I'll leave a day or so for this. JASpencer 15:03, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removed. JASpencer 14:37, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Put back. I do not run to your timetable. Imacomp 21:21, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but why is it back? How is it relevant to the article? Cheyinka 14:13, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to take it out. It really doesn't seem relevant to this article, whatever significance it might have somewhere else. Cheyinka 01:56, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Inimica vis/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Last edited at 22:50, 26 May 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 18:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Inimica vis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/19990127105315/http://www.io.com/~janebm/churchlaw.html to http://www.io.com/~janebm/churchlaw.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:19, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]