It's About Time! (Phineas and Ferb) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result February 28, 2010 Good article nominee Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Animation: American / Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article has been selected for use on the Animation portal. Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance). Disney Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. LGBTQ+ studies This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

This review is transcluded from Talk:It's About Time! (Phineas and Ferb)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CTJF83 GoUSA 19:18, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Please add alt text to both images.

•  Done The Flash ^{I am Jack's complete lack of surprise} 02:10, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• "they begin editing it to work properly" should editing be fixing? I've never seen the show, so I can't determine which is correct

•  Done The Flash ^{I am Jack's complete lack of surprise} 02:10, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• It says that it was critically successful, but I see 1 positive and 1 negative review on the episode as a whole. It should be changed to specify that the episode received mixed (or mostly positive if you can find 1 or 2 more positive reviews), while also noting that the musical aspect of the episode received positive reviews.

•  Done The Flash ^{I am Jack's complete lack of surprise} 02:10, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• The last stand alone sentence, is that referring to the production staff? I'm not a fan of stand alone sentences, so if you could merge that somewhere. I'd say add it to the first review paragraph and call the whole thing mostly positive reviews, although the production staff causes some what of a conflict of interest to reviewing the episode.

•  Done The Flash ^{I am Jack's complete lack of surprise} 02:10, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Ref 7, I don't see the PG rating on zap2it.com (not that I think it is important to list)

•  Done The Flash ^{I am Jack's complete lack of surprise} 02:10, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm concerned ref 15 requires Microsoft word to view (which for some reason is no longer installed on my computer) so some users won't be able to view the reference.

•  Done (archived it) The Flash ^{I am Jack's complete lack of surprise} 02:10, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I also have concerns about the first paragraph in the "themes" section. It says multiple sources say they have a somewhat homosexual relationship. I agree that ref 13 says that, but ref 14 doesn't really say it. 14 says "The whole thing is treated like they are breaking up in some corny teenage love movie". Which doesn't really say they have some sort of homosexual relationship, but just comparing their break up with how a break up on a teen love movie would be.
• I agree - the article states multiple times that "critics" (note plural) have said this, when we only have reference of one. And I can only think that that particular critic must have a bit of a weird mind to view them as having a homosexual relationship when their relationship is not remotely sexual. Indeed, if it WAS sexual, then surely the bestiality would be a more noteworthy component of the relationship than homosexuality, since one of the characters is an animal (and probably uder the age of 10, given platypus life-expectancy)! In actuality, it is plainly obvious that neither bestiality, homosexuality, or paedophilia were INTENDED overtones, just that one of them is a subtext that ONE critic chose to project onto it due to his own feelings. Since this is ONE critic, who must in view of the evidence be heavily biased, why is his view even being mentioned - let alone being portrayed as the view of multiple critics, and mentioned multiple times? 94.193.214.181 (talk) 12:25, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Still, it supports the two things it references, which are called homosexual undertones by ref 13. The Flash ^{I am Jack's complete lack of surprise} 02:10, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CTJF83 GoUSA 20:24, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Passing CTJF83 GoUSA 05:08, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on It's About Time! (Phineas and Ferb). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.dvdtown.com/review/phineas-and-ferb-tv-show/dvd/6123/2
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091103035445/http://disneymusic.disney.go.com/albums/phineasandferb.html to http://disneymusic.disney.go.com/albums/phineasandferb.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://news.toonzone.net/articles/25253/phineas-amp-ferb-the-fast-and-the-phineas-is-2-fast-kinda-phunny

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:25, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on It's About Time! (Phineas and Ferb). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20120907094637/http://www.justpressplay.net/movie-reviews/929-dvd-reviews/4835-Phineas-and-Ferb-The-Daze-of-Summer.html to http://www.justpressplay.net/movie-reviews/929-dvd-reviews/4835-Phineas-and-Ferb-The-Daze-of-Summer.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:27, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]