This article was nominated for deletion on 3 December 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force. Animation: American / Warner Bros. Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Warner Bros. Animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). Comics: DC Comics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by DC Comics work group. Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on August 25, 2014.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

I just wanna say that it's really awesome that someone else watches Justice League Unlimited as much as I do and can dismantle and re-examine it for its fine points. My girlfriend thinks I'm nuts for doing so. Now I know I'm not alone! : ) Donmega60645 13:00, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm suprised the article didn't bring up the similarities between the Justice Lords and Marvel's Squadron Supreme, right down to the part where they "modify" the behaviour of criminals. Yes, I'm well aware that the SS is based on the JLA, just as the Justice Lords themselves are. But since the article already mentions the Atom's "alternate universe" dream... --216.16.236.90 18:46, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One of the trivia points, involving the realisation that Hawkgirl is at Arkham Asylum, criticises John Stewart for making that. The point seems to suggest that she is sent to Arkham because Alt-Hawkgirl is a bad guy, and thus Hawkgirl is sent to the same place that Alt-Hawkgirl would be sent to. Of course the criticism of that point (that the Justice Lords aren't bad guys on that world) is correct, but that wasn't actually the point that John Stewart was making. To the Justice Lords, the Justice League were the bad guys - disruptive and dangerous. The Justice Lords sent Hawkgirl to the same place that they would send any other insane criminal. -- Supermorff 10:40, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody seems to have disputed this fact, so I'm going to remove the point from what is now the Inconsistency section. To reiterate: Green Lantern points that Hawkgirl (and other Justice League members) are crazed criminals FROM THE JUSTICE LORDS' POINT OF VIEW. -- Supermorff 21:26, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually as revealed on the DVD this was one of the original Crime Syndicate idea to slip through when the rewrote the concept.--216.31.14.232 (talk) 22:34, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not certain if they're correct. If anyone has the episodes & can fix them...? Noclevername 23:54, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Theres somthing wrong with the theory behind the inspiration of batman's code. If the code was meant to mirror the release date of batman's debut then the code should've been "5-1-9-3-9" not "9-1-9-3-9" because May is the fifth month of the year. Anonymous 00:11, 20 FEB, '07

NOTE: the above comment has been up for a month now and I've come to find no answer. If I do not receive a respnose in one week then the last paragraph on the trivia section will be deleted.

Okay so I deleted the erroneous batman's code thing on trivia after having no response from anybody.-Anonymous

Lords' Wonder Woman's costume is similar to the 1980s version of Donna Troy, and includes a Double-W insignia on the chest reminiscent of the late-1980s redesign of the character's costume in the comic books.

It doesn't that look similar to any of Donna's outfits to me, and the Double-W insignia is also worn by the "normal" animated Wonder Woman. Is a non-difference between the two outfits really notable? Daibhid C 16:03, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm surprised that no one has mentioned how similar the Justice Lords are to the Crime Syndicate of Amerika. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.33.9.99 (talk) 00:50, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someone has it marked that this should be merged with their article, and links to a discussion page that doesn't mention it. Since the Justice Lords at least THINK they are good guys, and there's no discussion, I'm removing that. CatherS (talk) 11:11, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually on the DVD the contaminators say that is was "originally planned as a straight Crime Syndicate story"but as they worked through the plot they realized that it worked better as being the Justice Leagers going down a different path.--BruceGrubb (talk) 19:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone explain how Green Lantern can retain his powerring as a Justice Lord? It doesn't really make sense, they kill people - you'd think that the Guardians would consider that a pretty severe breach on their rules? 95.209.250.197 (talk) 17:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pulled a Sinestro? Alucardbarnivous (talk) 21:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Justice Lords/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Last edited at 17:54, 19 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 20:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)