This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cambodia Kampuchea Krom is part of WikiProject Cambodia, a project to improve all Cambodia-related articles. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group on Wikipedia, aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Cambodia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.CambodiaWikipedia:WikiProject CambodiaTemplate:WikiProject CambodiaCambodia articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Cambodia To-do: edit history watch purge Let us work in the best reference and presentation of archaeological sites of Cambodia beyond Angkor like Sambor Prei Kuk, Angkor Borei (Takeo), etc. Should disambiguate Republican Party for Democracy and Renewal and generally try to link up social conscience with right-wing values. I'm looking for the best picture or any informations about the KAF's U-6 (Beaver). It seem that the KAF had 3 aircrafts. But in 1971, during the viet cong's sapper attack at the Pochentong Air Base,at least 1 Beaver was destroyed.In 1972 at leat 1 Beaver was refurbished with a new engine. http://www.khmerairforce.com/AAK-KAF/AVNK-AAK-KAF/Cambodia-Beaver-KAF.JPG Thankfull for this info. [Unsigned] Vietnam This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The grossly over inflated number of 10 million khmers is simply way too overexaggerated. There is simply no way to tell this figure is correct, how exactly can you as an independent journalist go around counting every pure khmer as there are communities of khmer kroms that are also mixed with other ethnuc minorities and list the population as over 10 million? Census data from the Vietnamese government lists this population as 1.3 million of khmers, which is much more believable than self published sources of 7 million to 10 million. The KKF (Khmer Krom Federation) and VOKK (Voice of Kampuchea Krom) seem to be anti-Vietnam organizations. If this is the extent of evidence, proof and statistics for this article and topic then it is terribly researched. It's like how did South Vietnam even exist with its civilians and armies of their own, when apparently from their sources, about half of the popilation are Khmers. Simply way too ludicrous. Norewritingofhistory (talk) 16:41, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Philip Taylor apparently mentions that this land was ceded to the Vietnamese by the French in 1949 (whether it was written by a Khmer or Philip Taylor himself is unknown, will have to fact check it), but was "ceded in 1949". How does that explain the Nguyen Dynasty's expansionism into Inner Cambodia? By late 1834, Minh Mạng renamed Cambodia as Tây Thành Province and incorporated it into his kingdom. Trương Minh Giảng was appointed as the governor of the province. The entirety of the Cambodian administration, tax resisters, military, foreign affairs, economy departments,... were transferred to Vietnamese control. This was before French rule. So how was this land of Cambodia ceded to the Vietnamese? Did someone rewrite Philip Taylor's book or is he just biased? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Norewritingofhistory (talk • contribs) 07:24, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so I read the part that was questionable. The author mentions said to have been separated from Cambodia during the process of French decolonisation and wrongfully placed under Vietnamese administration. Key word is said which means it isn't Philip Taylor's opinion. Whoever wrote it in a way to suggest that he thought of it as is, is blaspheming his work. Although Philip Taylor's book only provides a one sided point of view, the only contacts he had in this book were mainly with Khmer nationalists who may not have the full grasp of knowledge and spout revised irredentist claims.Norewritingofhistory (talk) 15:49, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why are these even accepted as primary sources, let alone even an actual source? Can we please get actual, relevant sources that come from that time period from Cambodia? I can't find any historical documents that list anything in here. Their claims are all revised irrendentism. Norewritingofhistory (talk) 16:11, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]