This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lakes High‑importance Lake Pontchartrain is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Louisiana / New Orleans High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana - New Orleans (assessed as High-importance).

This article is insufficently referenced. Also, some ofthe few references that are there incorrectly reflected the content of the reference. I tried to reword some sentences to more correctly reflect the referenced information. One link went to an error page so I removed it.

See:

• Wikipedia:Verifiability
• Wikipedia:Reliable sources
• Wikipedia:Citing sources

The article would be a good one with correct references. KarenAnn 18:11, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work. One thing I wondered is why you removed (twice) the pronunciation explanation. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 18:17, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very sorry to have done that and I would not have done it if I knew you wanted it there. KarenAnn 18:30, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, Lake Pontchartrain was temporarily an extension of the gulf of mexico (as opposed to a lake) during the Katrina crisis. -- DragonAtma —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.122.82.29 (talk) 20:36, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am a life long resident of SE Louisiana specifically Covington. The correct way to say this word is Ponchatrain the first r is silent.208.54.14.95 (talk) 00:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Vesago78[reply]

This lake is quite widely referred to as 'Ponchartrain' (without the 't') - even within the article. Is this simply a misspelling, needing to be corrected, or an acceptable alternative spelling? Colonies Chris (talk) 09:51, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Lake Pontchartrain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060603045134/http://marine.usgs.gov/fact-sheets/Pontchartrain/ to http://marine.usgs.gov/fact-sheets/Pontchartrain/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060603045134/http://marine.usgs.gov/fact-sheets/Pontchartrain/ to http://marine.usgs.gov/fact-sheets/Pontchartrain/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050907145351/http://www.mvn.usace.army.mil/eng/edhd/wcontrol/lpont.htm to http://www.mvn.usace.army.mil/eng/edhd/Wcontrol/lpont.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060603045134/http://marine.usgs.gov/fact-sheets/Pontchartrain/ to http://marine.usgs.gov/fact-sheets/Pontchartrain/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:01, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article is subject to B-class criteria (#1) as assessed. There are several inline "citation needed tags as well as potential link farming that needs to be addressed. Otr500 (talk) 00:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

section starts with "Owing to past exploitation..." but the entire page never even mentions what. OIL&gas .- how can that be? Has this been edited out ? Platform explosions anyone? Wuerzele (talk) 21:43, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]