Epstein Files Full PDF

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance). Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors: [[List of AMD Ryzen processors#Whitehaven (1000 series HEDT CPUs)|Ryzen Threadripper 1000 series]] The anchor (#Whitehaven (1000 series HEDT CPUs)) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. [[List of AMD Ryzen processors#Raven_Ridge_(2000_series_APUs)|desktop]] The anchor (#Raven_Ridge_(2000_series_APUs)) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error

Wold be nice if the family name (6, fh, 10h or 11h) of each chip where specified. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.241.192.62 (talk) 20:01, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This new AnandTech article (8/23/04) might be of help to some people here.--GD 04:55, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)

The AMD Geode and AMD Am186 microcontroller series need to be mentioned, as well as AMD's SC520.

And where's the Turion? —Vespristiano 18:10, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

K9 was indeed originally meant to be dual-core K8, but AMD has since revised their plans. The X2s are classified as K8 by various reputable sources, including but not limited to sandpile.org and AMD themselves (which must be worth something).

Oh, also, added San Diego in for regular A64s. Yes, the San Diego is used in both the FX and certain A64s (the 3700+, for example). SVI 01:17, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the whole K9 thing is dubious at best. In May 2006 there were rumors about K8L. This was at least a year after dual core was launched in 2005. In one interview, an AMD official even used K8L synomously with K10. Is there any reason to include the K9 rumor which was never used by AMD? The K9 designation simply comes from adding to the previous generations: K5, K6, K7, K8. However there is every indication that AMD understood the negative connotations of K9 and never intended to use it. This is similar to the way many hotels skip room number 13.

Intel had much more trouble with this yet none of these rejected names are in the Intel section:

Pentium, Sexium (rejected) Pentium II, Pentium III, Pentium IV (rejected perhaps because of poison ivy) Pentium 4, Pentium 5 (rejected probably because of fear of the common 55 mph speed limit) Pentium 4D, Pentium 4E, Pentium 4F (rejected probably because of the military designation 4F meaning unfit for service) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brehmel (talk • contribs) 11:36, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

K8L = development codename for AMD Turion (K8 low power), K9 = development codename for dual-core K8. K9 was originally something completely new but dropped later on so re-used for the K8 dual-cores. --Denniss (talk) 14:40, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There was an article at the inquirer showing a photograph of asian AMD workers holding a sign that the last K7 processor had been packaged (can't find the page now). Plus there is this article (I don't have any articles from other sites ATM). So I guess the K7 headline can be changed to K7 series (1999–2005). Also I haven't seen any Socket-A CPUs on AMD's price-lists for some time now (as quoted in the press), be it Sempron or Athlon MP, see for example this article on Heise Online (german, this is where c't mag comes from) from August 1 2005. Ok, there still is the Geode NX which is K7-based, but this article doesn't feature any Geode CPUs.

wasn't there a 386sx? Kingturtle 01:24, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    There most certainly was I used to own one. http://www.cpu-collection.de/?l0=co&l1=AMD&l2=386%20SX  
    AMD Am386SX-20, Am386SX/SXL-25, and Am386SX/SXL-33. Evil genius (talk) 06:26, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The list of code names on the external link redirects to AMD community front page. I couldn't find the list there. Maybe someone who is more familiar will know where the list has gone and fix the link? Ta jayoval (talk) 21:26, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are several templates in AfC so that the tables can be shared. 84.73.9.156 (talk) 18:43, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]