Talk:List of United States Presidents by generation

Technopedia Center

Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science
S1 Informatics S1 Information Systems S1 Information Technology S1 Computer Engineering S1 Electrical Engineering S1 Civil Engineering

faculty of Economics and Business
S1 Management S1 Accountancy

Faculty of Letters and Educational Sciences
S1 English literature S1 English language education S1 Mathematics education S1 Sports Education

Talk:List of United States Presidents by generation - Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

United States: Presidents / Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject United States Presidents (assessed as Low-importance).
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Does this page need to exist?

To put a hold on this edit war, I'm launching this discussion. I don't think this page really needs to exist. The generation info can be preserved by moving it to List of Presidents of the United States by date of birth D O N D E groovily Talk to me 02:51, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, if there be a mention on names of generations in article "List of Presidents of the United States by date of birth", then it would be OK. But there is no mention about names of generations in that article. Only Zodiac signs and other matters are mentioned there. Place presidents listed by names of generations there and I will agree with you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.127.11.74 (talk) 07:33, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The table at that page is a sortable table - because of that, I think it makes more sense to list the generations and associated years above the table and allow users to sort by birth date if they want to view it that way. I don't want to mess up the sorbability of the table. To add the generations and have it look as nice as the non-sortable table we have here, would probably require breaking the sortability. With birth years already there and the table sortable, I'd rather just list the generations and their years.

An alternative is to merge it to Generations (book). I think this might make a lot more sense. This list is much more relevant to the theory presented in the book than it is to the presidency. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 03:50, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do as you like but preserve this list "by generation" on some page, in some wiki article. One thing I don´t understand: Why does this list "by generation" annoy you so much ? Order of presidents by generation reveals us many interesting things. Change of generations in case of Eisenhower-Kennedy in 1961 or Bush Sr.-Clinton in 1993 etc. Names of generations help us more than zodiac signs to comprehend the historical era a president lived in and each this historical era forms his attitudes and political decisions. It is complex matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.127.11.74 (talk) 14:58, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Categories:

Hidden category:

WikiProject banners with redundant class parameter