This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Singapore Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

I will wish to ask if anyone can convert this to a neatly organized table form and written in a more organized format, such as in the table below?

Color key

Date	Name	Crime	Location	Summary	Sentence	Source
3 January 2020	Paul Leslie Quirk	Culpable homicide	Compassvale, Sengkang	Quirk, a schizophrenic Australian, murdered his Singaporean wife Christina Khoo Gek Hwa via a mop stick and throwing his dog from the balcony to its death.	10 years' imprisonment	[1]
February 2020	Megan Khung's mother and her boyfriend	Infanticide	Paya Lebar	See also: Death of Megan Khung Khung was allegedly killed by her mother and its boyfriend, in which her corpse was later burned with the help of her friend about three months later. Khung's grandmother lodged a police report on 20 July which led to its arrests of all three suspects for the alleged murder. All three suspects are currently pending trial.	Pending trial	[2][3][4]
March – 10 November 2020	Mohamad Fazli Selamat and Roslinda Jamil	Infanticide/Manslaughter	Jurong	See also: 2020 Jurong child killing For eight months, an 11-year-old girl (whose name was withheld due to a gag order) was physically abused by her stepfather Mohamad Fazli Selamat and mother Roslinda Jamil inside their Jurong flat. The girl was reportedly made to eat chilli padi or being beaten by an exercise bar or other objects as punishment for her supposed misconducts. The girl died from the abuse around 7 November following another abuse from Fazli (her mother Roslinda acted as a bystander).	5 years and 11 months' imprisonment and 12 strokes (Fazli) 7 years, 8 months and 3 weeks' imprisonment (Roslinda)	[5]
10 May 2020	Surajsrikan Diwakar Mani Tripathi	Murder	Punggol	See also: Punggol Field murder A jogger, Tay Rui Hao, was stabbed to death by Surajsrikan, and was arrested after the attack was recorded through a CCTV camera. Through psychiatric reports, he was reported to have emotional distress on the date of 10 May; in 1999, his father abandoned his then-pregnant mother about two months after the marriage, and in 2018, he was enlisted by the military. He was assessed to be suffering from borderline intelligence, and both severe social anxiety disorder and obsessive compulsive disorder, though he was mentally sound and fit to stand trial. The incident also prompted the government to pass laws to allow police to obtain data from TraceTogether for police investigations.	Life imprisonment (with parole possibility) and 15 strokes	[6][7]
27 August 2020	Cui Han	Voluntarily causing grievous hurt	Boon Lay	Cui beat up his wife for four years, Liang Xueqiu after being caught of an affair with another man; Liang died from Intracerebral hemorrhage as a result of the injuries.	7-year imprisonment and 9 strokes	[8][9][10]
11 December 2020	Name withheld	Culpable homicide	Loyang, Pasir Ris	A 14-year-old boy (name withheld per the Children and Young Persons Act) killed his father through stabbing with a fruit knife. The boy had diagnosed with Internet gaming disorder and autism at young age, and plotted revenge after his father restricted his access to computer games since June that year. This is the first case where a minor committed murder, culpable homicide, attempted murder or causing grievous hurt; per the act, a detention period has to be imposed instead.	5-year detention in Singapore Boys' Home	[11]

Let me know what do you think and if this is better organized. Thanks. Sculture65 (talk) 03:03, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you introduced a number of inaccuracies in some edits or the flow of content added by you was not smooth or logical. Too many to mention here. I tried to correct a few. Please be more careful.

in addition, please respect content introduced by others by not removing all of it and replacing with your own content which was not better but has room for improvement.

I dont think i can support your proposed table. Firstly it is too tedious ans onerous. Secondly, i rather collaborate with editors who are more respectful of others. Globallycz (talk) 06:09, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please note I am here due to a ping on my talkpage and on WikiProject Singapore's talkpage.

@Sculture65 : There will be a need to summarise the current summary even more. The colour coding might be difficult for other editors helping to update/maintain or takeover. Sometimes a culprit might be charged with both sexual assault and murder for a rape and kill case which will make colour coding hard and also categorisation of crime harder. I believe the table has only sort function so if I wanted to sort and see how many sexual assault cases, some of the cases will be sorted in a very weird manner (It might be sorted as Murder / Sexual Assault for a case and Sexual Assault for another case so all the sexual assault cases will be all over the table and defeating the sort function. Also a miscategorisation of Sexual Assault as rape will throw your idea off). I appreciate the thoughts but I think more brainstorming on how to sort the table is still needed.

@Globallycz : I appreciate if you can be civil and just reply Sculture65 based on his question. Please be objective and comment on his proposed table structure, whether is it viable or what can be improved. I have no idea your initial sentences are over the editing disputes over the article or based on the sample table provided. If it is over editing dispute, please open a new section and have a proper discussion (Please do not do it over edit summaries). If your non-support of the table is based on editing disputes over the article, please withdraw your non-support as it is not about the table. Please note also on boomerang as you are bordering on incivility. ~ JASWE (talk) 05:09, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My nonsupport is based on two main reasons as laid out in the last two sentences of my previous reply. The first part of opening response explained how the editor had been disrespectful of others edit. He deleted the edit of others completely without really improving the content. I would always try to preserve some of the inputs given by original editor unless it is factually inaccurate. Frankly, nobody replied him for over a month until you and me. Why do you think so? I was only being frank. I would have taken it as a non support when no one replies. I know where you are coming from but if we are not assertive in certain situation, some editors take it for granted. I will not respond further. I suggest you review some of his edits and derive an opinion of this editor yourself. Thus far, he has responded well to some of my edit which corrected some of his earlier edits. As for the table, my comments would not ruin fuether his chances. I believe your assessment of the table was that it may be too difficult for some editors to follow. As said before, no one has shown any support on his proposed table and I was just being frank. It needs major simplification for it to get any support. Globallycz (talk) 05:49, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Globallycz : Sculture65 asked for comments for his table and you chose to use it as a forum to discuss the editing disputes. You are being disrespectful right now. This has crossed over to incivility. Being assertive in the wrong forum will land you into trouble, regardless the forum is in Wikipedia or not.

@Sculture65 : Ignore Globallycz's comment and as mentioned in WikiProject Singapore's talkpage, please raise a new section and discuss content dispute. ~ JASWE (talk) 06:33, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry if you are unable to agree with me. For me, how collaborative an editor has shown to be has an influence on whether I support his or her proposed table. I know you disagreed and see it as me using the forum wrongly. I do not think it is right for anyone to tell others to ignore another's comment. Anyway, lets leave it as it is here. Globallycz (talk) 07:42, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Globallycz : You just shown that you are not able to be objective in your views and assessment of things and that if an editor sided with you and that you will support that editor. Your "how collaborative an editor" is easier to be understood as "how agreeable that editor is with you". This is not what Wikipedia is all about. So basically I had disagreed with you and based on your latest reply, you are not willing to work through this issue with me at all.

I asked Sculture65 to ignore your comments on the table you disagreed based on an existing editing dispute with him. Such comments are not helpful, disrespectful and goes against what Wikipedia stands for (see the fourth pillar of Wikipedia). ~ JASWE (talk) 08:02, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot support the table partly because it is too tedious and onerous. I thought your initial comments on his table was also along the same thought. Please do not stretch your arguement. If i see that your edits are generally reasonable, i will most likely support your proposals and collaborate with you as I believe your proposals would most likely be reasonable too. Lets leave it. Globallycz (talk) 08:09, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]