Talk:List of sport utility vehicles

Technopedia Center

Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science
S1 Informatics S1 Information Systems S1 Information Technology S1 Computer Engineering S1 Electrical Engineering S1 Civil Engineering

faculty of Economics and Business
S1 Management S1 Accountancy

Faculty of Letters and Educational Sciences
S1 English literature S1 English language education S1 Mathematics education S1 Sports Education

Talk:List of sport utility vehicles - Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 December 2021. The result of the discussion was keep.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Unsporting

A few of the military vehicles listed are pretty much outside of the SUV category; if they belong at all here, they should be in a separate section. Some are too big, too specialized, or never used as such. Anmccaff (talk) 21:12, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RfC across several subject areas.

Unanimous consensus to not intermix military and purely commercial vehicles with sports utility vehicles.Winged Blades^Godric 16:06, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(The question cuts across several categories, obviously.) Should military vehicles and purely commercial vehicles be listed completely intermixed with "sports utility vehicles," or are SUVs essentially consumer vehicles? Anmccaff (talk) 07:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think they should. Reading the current lead of the sports utility vehicle page, "A sport utility vehicle or suburban utility vehicle (SUV) is a vehicle classified as a light truck, but operated as a family vehicle." That phrase at the end determines it for me to be consumer vehicles. SportsGuy17 (talk) 17:23, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Excluded. The Agrale Marruá, for instance, is clearly not designed to be "operated as a family vehicle". I suspect that the inclusion of military vehicles in the list was intended as a joke. Maproom (talk) 08:40, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No -- No they should not. Damotclese (talk) 23:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, unless there are sources describing a vehicle as SUV it does not belong here.“WarKosign ” 07:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No to intermixing freely, as per definitions above, also WP:COMMONNAME. SemanticMantis (talk) 16:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Tuner and rebadged model

the list contains many cars that are nothing but TUNER and many Chinese models no longer in production that were not rebadges of European or Japanese cars — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.98.104.69 (talk) 11:23, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Add powertrain info

With more and more manufacturers producing their new modeles as electric vehicles, it makes sense to note which SUVs are electric (BEVs, FCEVs and PHEVs) and which are have internal combustion engines (ICEs). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dane Rossenrode (talk • contribs) 15:01, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Class error

The Honda CR-V is a compact not a midsize crossover. --Vmsa (talk) 03:45, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

JAC S2.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:52, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Mahindra scorpio Nashik.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:22, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]