This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Logan International Airport article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 12 months

Logan International Airport was nominated as a Engineering and technology good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 19, 2020, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Airports This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is supported by the airport project. United States: Massachusetts / Boston High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - Boston (assessed as High-importance). Greater Boston Public Transit Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of the Greater Boston Public Transit WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of public transportation in the Greater Boston metropolitan area. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Greater Boston Public TransitWikipedia:WikiProject Greater Boston Public TransitTemplate:WikiProject Greater Boston Public TransitGreater Boston Public Transit Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Looking through the Ground Transport section, it appears some the information is poorly framed and includes non-relevent information (ie Uber and Lyft mass messaging it user base to protest massport changes). Ideally I think the intention of the original submitter was to include all the options but got lost in writing all the details. 68.229.80.75 (talk) 01:06, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Went ahead and cleaned up the section. Pentawing^Talk 06:21, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After waiting over a year to see if someone else was going to do it, I have noted those airline services that have not restarted following the withdrawal of flights in 2020 due to the COVID pandemic. This has been repeatedly reversed, despite citing reliable sources in each case, and being completely in keeping the standard practice for articles on major airports around the world—including at other entries in the same Airlines and Destinations section of the article itself, as there is a surfeit of other such notations made by other editors at Delta, JetBlue, etc, and recently another contributor input the ITA information for their future flights to Rome using the exact same format! I highly doubt that there could be a constructive suggestion as to why the Logan page would not follow this consistent convention, but if so I'd be very interested to hear that opinion. Otherwise there has to be a valid basis for undoing these citations other than the classic, tautological catch-all fiat "it's not encyclopedic" when it's simply the mundane practice of Airport articles on Wikipedia and is not disallowed or controversial at all of those dozens of articles.

I've long been aware that there has been a high degree of territory-marking and turf claiming on the Logan Airport article, so I limit my contributions here, but at some point this is getting out of hand when legitimate, factual edits which enhance the relevant information on the page, in line with what is done at virtually all other airport pages, is disallowed by another editor. It smacks of subjectivity. Unless that editor is going to go across Wikipedia and delete all the remarks noting '(suspended)' '(begins X date)' or '(resumes X date)' etc etc across hundreds of Airport articles, than this nothing more than guarding a pet article and applying personal preferences which only results in a less accurate article. To remove this information would suggest to the reader, for instance, that Cabo Verde Airlines has continued to connect Logan to Praia, just as BA is flying daily to London or JAL to Tokyo, when it is verifiable that Cabo Verde Airlines has not flown at all in over a year and is not serving Boston. How is that defensible? —Dfiner (talk) 15:09, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports/Archive 19#COVID-19-related Schedule Suspensions/Changes. Garretka (talk) 16:43, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That short section has literally not been updated since March of 2020 when the situation was indeed volatile and constantly changing. More than 18 months later we have reached a new steady state with regards to these services. Dfiner (talk) 21:18, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a directory - such detail is overly directory like. Andrewgprout (talk) 23:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, we don’t list temporary suspensions, the has been widely discussed since the start of the pandemic. These routes will at some point since travel is slowly opening back up. Rzxz0839 (talk) 15:27, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These are not "temporary" suspensions, they have been out of service for more than a year! How is it better and more factual to show them as if they are still in operation? If such detail is not fit for Wikipedia—a totally unsupported assertion—then how does this same reasoning not apply to all of the rest of such notations in this very article itself—much less across all Airport articles? This is simply more edit warring behavior from [[talk. Dfiner (talk) 21:19 26 October 2021 (UTC)

There hasn't been United Express service to IAD or ORD at BOS for many years but these errors have persisted on this page for a long time. A search of the schedules will reveal that no such service exists. EWR service remains. 147.161.130.169 (talk) 19:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]