This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

South America: Guyana Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Guyana (assessed as Low-importance). Venezuela Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Venezuela, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Venezuela on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VenezuelaWikipedia:WikiProject VenezuelaTemplate:WikiProject VenezuelaVenezuela articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Brazil: Geography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Geography of Brazil task force (assessed as Low-importance). Mountains Top‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

I have found numerous different figures for the height of this mountain. What is the truth?--Filll 21:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article on Auyantepui states that is is "almost 3000m high", which contradicts the statement in this article that Roraima "the highest point for distance of 549.44 kilometres (341.48 miles) in any direction". Many sources give the maximum altitude of Roraima as 2810m.Cerambyx (talk) 09:29, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should not the Roraima water falls be mentioned? [1]--Filll 21:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Czech and Slovak team explored the Crystal Eyes Cave on Mount Roraima: [2].--Filll 21:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[3]--Filll 22:16, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[4]--Filll 22:19, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would any specialists on the topic care to explain how a mountain like this is formed?

It was formed by erosion from an uplifted plateau, namely the Guiana Highlands. --Bejnar (talk) 00:53, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• A simple check of English sources shows that Mount Roraima is more commonly used. Take a look at Google Books just for an example. "Monte Roraima" is used primarily in non-English books. --Bejnar (talk) 05:58, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• I concur; the name in English is definitely Mount Roraima. In particular, British Colonial and Guyanese (i.e. English-language) sources support this convention. I'm making the move, per WP:MOSNAME. TheFeds 20:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The "Portuguese" pronunciation given is Brazilian Portuguese. This should be specified.

Not even Brazilian Portuguese, the first "a" is definitely not nasalized.150.165.134.250 (talk) 19:51, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article says that the Mountain is shared by Brazil, Guyana and Venezuela, but the map shows it entirely in Venezuela. Which is it? It can't be both.--dunnhaupt (talk) 20:02, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Psaltisuk (talk) 21:01, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mount Roraima. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130617070003/http://ecotropicos.saber.ula.ve/db/ecotropicos/Edocs/vol6_n1/articulo3.pdf to http://ecotropicos.saber.ula.ve/db/ecotropicos/Edocs/vol6_n1/articulo3.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130605015619/http://download.cell.com/current-biology/pdf/PIIS0960982212007105.pdf to http://download.cell.com/current-biology/pdf/PIIS0960982212007105.pdf
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://download.cell.com/current-biology/mmcs/journals/0960-9822/PIIS0960982212007105.mmc1.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:44, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The final sentence in the lede states "The privileged setting and relatively easy access and climbing conditions on the south side of the cliffs make Mount Roraima one of the most popular destinations for hikers." (emphasis added) Can anyone explain what "privileged" means in this context? Bricology (talk) 02:02, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I had the same thought. Also 'most popular destinations for hikers.' Most popular in Venezuela, South America, the world? I went to the footnote link, Britannica, and found nothing on hikers. RobotBoy66 (talk) 09:52, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The entire article needs a heavy copyedit as grammatical and syntactical errors abound. Parts of it may be the outcome of Google Translator. RobotBoy66 (talk) 10:52, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]