This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Vietnam This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Anti-war This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anti-war, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the anti-war movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anti-warWikipedia:WikiProject Anti-warTemplate:WikiProject Anti-warAnti-war ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. United States History This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. WikiProject United States History To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs Other : Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess: {{WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}} {{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}} Organizations This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has not a single cite. Even a cursory glance shows glaring errors of fact - for example, this one sentence paragraph Following the election of Richard M. Nixon, Mobe organized a "counter-inaugural" to take place in Washington D.C. on the day of Nixon's inauguration. This demonstration as well attracted only about 10,000 and was accompanied by street violence. Considering there were 7000 protesters arrested that day in Washington, DC [United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary], the 10,000 number is almost surely pulled from thin air. I do not think that ANY other single demonstration in the United States even approached that number of arrested demonstrators.

Perhaps this entire article should be reduced to a one sentence stub that can be expanded with well-cited sources that provide reliable information. Neonorange (talk) 05:39, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Mobilization Committee to End the War in Vietnam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051219220648/http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/web/20051021-pentagon-vietnam-protest-washington-dc-lyndon-johnson-jerry-rubin-david-dellinger-allen-ginsberg-yippie-robert-mcnamara.shtml to http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/web/20051021-pentagon-vietnam-protest-washington-dc-lyndon-johnson-jerry-rubin-david-dellinger-allen-ginsberg-yippie-robert-mcnamara.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:37, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

   The prior revision's wording, 'attempted by means of meditation and chanting to "levitate" the building', was clever as a slogan-meme, and worth quoting, but is almost certainly a bald-faced lie. No one who was in possession of their rational faculties came closer than verbally and by play-acting, performing actions metaphorically representing that fantasy meme, and we may even have frank admissions from some of the organizers that they would not have claimed to be stating actual intentions or beliefs if they expected stable minds to fail to recognize the mock-intentions as ironic suggestions that would advance the following perception: that the policy-makers in the administration were irrational, and/or lying to the portion of the population who would accept the lies as plausible. (Sorry; it's ironic that adequately stating what 'should not need ' explication is a really tough task! And I've given myself the task -- in case it may be needed -- of adequately stating what should be "obvious".)
--Jerzy•t 19:29, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]