A fact from Polygon experiment appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 May 2011, and was viewed approximately 1,200 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 26 November 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from POLYGON experiment to Polygon experiment. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 26 November 2021
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) VR talk 16:28, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
POLYGON experiment → Polygon experiment – The all-caps isn't used in the Physics Today cited source, and there is no clear justification for it. It also doesn't appear to be all-capped in the Kort & Samoĭlenko cited source and is not consistently all-capped in the Kuh Kim Ph.D. thesis. The proposed target name already redirects to the same topic, and has ever since it and the article were created more than ten years ago. — BarrelProof (talk) 06:33, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support: POLYGON, MODE and POLYMODE are rendered as such in the Munk&Day. MODE is an acronym and this appears to be an editorial decision based on how to render "polymode", which is a combination of the former two. It is not rendered in all caps in Physics Today and all caps would be contrary to MOS:CAPS (see MOS:ALLCAPS), WP:NCCAPS and WP:AT (see WP:TITLETM for a quite similar case). It also raises the question of how "polygon" should be capitalised in running text, and the correct capitalisation for the related terms that are red-linked ATM. Cinderella157 (talk) 07:28, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support – No need for such shouting, when sources get away with a more normal style (like ours). Dicklyon (talk) 23:51, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support - Not an acronym so no need to cap. Primergrey (talk) 18:51, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Start-Class physics articles
- Low-importance physics articles
- Start-Class physics articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class fluid dynamics articles
- Fluid dynamics articles
- Start-Class physics history articles
- Physics history articles
- Start-Class Oceans articles
- Unknown-importance Oceans articles
- WikiProject Oceans articles
- Start-Class history of science articles
- Unknown-importance history of science articles
- WikiProject History of Science articles
- Start-Class Russia articles
- Low-importance Russia articles
- Low-importance Start-Class Russia articles
- Start-Class Russia (technology and engineering) articles
- Technology and engineering in Russia task force articles
- Start-Class Russia (science and education) articles
- Science and education in Russia task force articles
- Start-Class Russia (physical geography) articles
- Physical geography of Russia task force articles
- WikiProject Russia articles
- Start-Class Soviet Union articles
- Low-importance Soviet Union articles
- WikiProject Soviet Union articles