This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Paranormal This redirect falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal Skepticism This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism Cryptozoology This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptozoology, an attempt to improve coverage of the pseudoscience and subculture of cryptozoology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CryptozoologyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptozoologyTemplate:WikiProject CryptozoologyCryptids

Why is it not noted that Billy Meier is still beeing accused of beeing a hoaxer, and that some of his footage has been proven to be fake? We should include this for sense.

UserDoe 19:22, 29 August 2007 (UTC)UserDoe[reply]

• In my opinion this article is somehow very biased towards Billy Meier, who is still beeing accused of beeing a hoaxer. If we're writing an article we should keep it neutral and don't make it look biased towards a special side or person. Therefore it should be noted that Mr. Meier is beeing accused of fakery. Or we simply open a new article about Mr. Meier and leave the Billy Meier* stuff out of the pleiadean article.

• * ok i see we already have one about Mr. Meier

here's _one_ page for example that talks about the hoax: http://www.ufoencounters.co.uk/BillyMeier.html there are lots of other pages. just search via google or yahoo for "billy Meier"hoaxer or similar.

m2c

UserDoe 19:46, 29 August 2007 (UTC)UserDoe[reply]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 14:12, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I read somewhere that Pleiadeans had some connections to the September 11 attacks. Is this true? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.10.238.140 (talk) 02:19, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did you think it was a coincidence that not one single Pleiadean is listed among those who were killed in the attack?... It's true... Not one... neither at the Twin Towers or the at the Pentagon! Surely this proves that they knew all about it ahead of time! Blueboar (talk) 04:25, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ah, if you want to digg deeper into alien conspiracies (which I honestly hope you don't want to)... search for the "reptilians" (aliens with reptilian forms). Along with the greys (manipulators and tricksters) and the Pleiadeans (basically elves)... those are part of the "most known" aliens.--Elvenmuse (talk) 07:07, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added a external link reference to the homepage of Maggador IX-777 whom have been mentioned in the article. The homepage is PleiadianTalk.tk [1]

If someone else would like to make a page about Maggador IX-777 feel free to do so, I have not the knowledge on how to do that or what info to add.

Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.49.100.227 (talk) 18:19, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone is interested in further developing this article, I think the book *UFO Religions* by Christopher Partridge may be quite helpful. Yonderboy (talk) 21:48, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The numbering of the references in this article is a mess. Thodef (talk) 10:08, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

are there any accounts of the name Erae? (AE as in FAE)--Elvenmuse (talk) 07:04, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Pleiadeans/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Last edited at 19:38, 29 August 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 03:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)