This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Comics: United States / Marvel Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Related work groups: /  This article is supported by United States comics work group. This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

I just wrote Powers (comic) and then found this article had already been written. I'll let a neutral third party take the first crack at combining them into a single article. MK 06:04, 4 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I added some information from the duplicate article to this one and will remove the duplicate. MK 00:46, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Can somebody tell me why my superhero box for Walker was taken down? He's currently a superhero called Millenium, so i don't know what the problem was. If he stops being a superhero i'd take it down. And anyway surely a debate is needed first, because i think with his immortality and solving crime (even as a cop) that makes him a superhero anyway, surely... ChocolateRoses(Talk) 12:30, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it because the article is about the comic book Powers, not the character Walker, and putting an infobox about one of the series' characters there is very confusing. If anything, the comic book infobox should be used in this article. The superhero infobox should instead be used in a seperate article about the character, if there's enough content to justify such an article. --Fritz S. (Talk) 12:36, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a project: Cast bios on the different characters, superhuman and not. Any takers?—This unsigned comment was added by Coolgamer (talk • contribs) .

I'll start working on some of them.—This unsigned comment was added by Bookwurmnep (talk • contribs) .

I was thinking i could write the definitive synopses of all the arcs with just a spoiler warning, starting with the Chrisitian Walker origin arc (was that Forever?) and then leading onto Who Killed Retro Girl? onwards, careful to tie them all in together as technically this would be out of the order of the books. Would there be someone willing to contribute to this project? I would also like to add a "powers/ abilities" secton encasing Walker's known powers and Deena's (as she has at the moment), plus Walker's new Millennium identity if there's enough information in the books. First, however, it would require a discussion on Walker inparticular. If you look at the culmination of Forever, or whatever the origin arc is called (i'll obviously check when writing it all up!), Walker sits there with a floating, golden glow in front of his face! Am i missing something or is this the manifestation of some of his old powers. Considering wolf acquired his again through evolution due to living under a drainer and Walker works with drainers every day this is a possibility, but should it be commented on in a full article? Also, he claims to have SOME strength left over, early on in the Powers series, when you learn he's the hero formerly known as Diamond. BUT he doesn't seem to have aged in the 20odd years since losing those powers. SO my question is: bad artwork or deliberate show of continuing immortality? Oeming doesnt do bad artwork so i was thinking he's retained his immortality? Can we get a discussion going on all this? If you know more Powers readers, maybe you can direct them here so we can discuss this?? Thanx.ChocolateRoses 21:19, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, im replying to myself here, but i started with "background" and the forever arc. i might just call it "forever" actually. if thats what its called then who am i to retitle Bendis' great work?? Anyway it needs clean-up and some better phrasing etc. Please feel free to, as long as you don't edit it all out!! Thatd be rude. It took me a cupla hours to go through it all...ChocolateRoses 21:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

IF I hadn't already read this series I would have been disappointed at the lack of spoiler warning in the plot section.

I am not familiar enough with the wikipedia structure to fix it myself, or I would. Could someone help out?

Thanks

203.43.180.174 02:33, 1 May 2007 (UTC)tefol[reply]

I too would appreciate a spoiler-free plot section, something which lucidly talks about the what the comic is about, instead of a simple series of facts about the character. It is possible to write a spoiler-free plot summary.

But if spoilers are to be left in, we should at least leave up the spoiler warning. I can't imagine that if someone wrote of the ultimate fate of Harry Potter and Hermione in the third paragraph of the Harry Potter article that it would go down well with the Wikipedia community. Regardless of what the section is titled, spoilers are spoilers. (I'd also point to the thousands of movies articles that have a plot section with the words "Spoiler" properly at the top.)

74.70.185.44 03:04, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The spoilers in the synopsis section are unforgivable. Part of the story's greatness is the unwinding of back stories as the series goes on. This needs to be addressed right away. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vivatforx (talk • contribs) 00:19, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm suprised none of the dead heroes in the series have been posted on here. Should they be posted? and if so Should we start a section for them? Bioman316 (talk) 01:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In the section giving the plot synopsis for each of the various story arcs, the "Little Deaths" arc is said to include not only issues 12-14, but also issue 7 and annual #1. Haing read all of these issues I can testify that issue 7 and annual #1 are stand alone stories that have nothing to do with the "Little Deaths" arc. Unless there is some important information I am missing I suggest these two issues be removed from that portion of the synopsis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.186.153.248 (talk) 00:46, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In the bio of Zora, it is stated that she and Walker knew each other for centuries (true), since ancient times in China. In the comics they meet in China, but around the Boxer Rebellion (well 16 years before) so it's actually then end of the 19th century. Maybe it could be changed to be more precise? Ancient China could be any time since ~2000 BC or more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8420:4DBE:C600:1546:CA06:45AE:F8BE (talk) 01:38, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Powers (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080611170105/http://hiddenrobot.com/POWERS/castcrew.html to http://hiddenrobot.com/POWERS/castcrew.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://hiddenrobot.com/POWERS/PDAILY/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080212050402/http://hiddenrobot.com/POWERS/PDAILY2/ to http://hiddenrobot.com/POWERS/PDAILY2/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080412221738/http://hiddenrobot.com/POWERS/PDAILY3/ to http://hiddenrobot.com/POWERS/PDAILY3/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://hiddenrobot.com/POWERS/PDAILY4/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060902143610/http://www.hiddenrobot.com/PDAILY/ to http://www.hiddenrobot.com/PDAILY
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070627124124/http://hiddenrobot.com/POWERS/ to http://hiddenrobot.com/POWERS

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:11, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]