This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assessment comments
Clearly more than Stub-class. As for B-class, I think it should be more comprehensive, preferably with more sources, but if a more experienced reviewer feels it is B-class, I'd have no objections. Is it considered proper to have an additional infobox for the sound track? I don't recall ever seeing that before. But again, I may be mistaken. decltype (talk) 04:19, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Oh, and I did not strike out the assessment request, to allow for a second opinion. decltype (talk) 04:22, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- It could be a B-class after checking the b-switches. I would not touch grammar myself though. Agathoclea (talk) 09:13, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
B-Class review for WikiProject Films
This article has been checked against the project's criteria for B-Class status:
- C-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- C-Class India articles of Low-importance
- C-Class West Bengal articles
- Low-importance West Bengal articles
- C-Class West Bengal articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject West Bengal articles
- C-Class Indian cinema articles
- Mid-importance Indian cinema articles
- C-Class Indian cinema articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Indian cinema articles
- WikiProject India articles
- C-Class Germany articles
- Low-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- C-Class film articles
- C-Class German cinema articles
- German cinema task force articles
- Indian cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles