This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Somali Civil War (2009–present) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months

A news item involving Somali Civil War (2009–present) was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 21 June 2009.

WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article Somali Civil War (2009–present), along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are: Limit of one revert in 24 hours: This article is under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24-hour period) Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned. Remedy instructions and exemptions Enforcement procedures: Violations of any restrictions (excluding 1RR/reverting violations) and other conduct issues should be reported to the administrators' incidents noticeboard. Violations of revert restrictions should be reported to the administrators' edit warring noticeboard. Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense. An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned. With respect to any reverting restrictions: Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion. Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism. Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction. Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!

Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes), which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article: You must be logged-in to an autoconfirmed or confirmed account (usually granted automatically to accounts with 10 edits and an age of 4 days) Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

The 2024 Busley army base attack article was blanked on August 24, 2024 and that title now redirects to Somali Civil War (2009–present). The contents of the former article are available in the redirect's history.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Al-Shabaab (militant group)#Leaders|Emir of al-Shabaab]] The anchor (#Leaders) has been deleted by other users before. [[Al-Shabaab (militant group)#Leaders|Former Emir of al-Shabaab]] The anchor (#Leaders) has been deleted by other users before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Africa: Burundi / Djibouti / Ethiopia / Kenya / Sierra Leone / Ghana / Uganda Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject Burundi. This article is supported by WikiProject Djibouti. This article is supported by WikiProject Ethiopia. This article is supported by WikiProject Kenya. This article is supported by WikiProject Sierra Leone. This article is supported by WikiProject Ghana. This article is supported by WikiProject Uganda. Crime and Criminal Biography: Organized crime / Terrorism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Organized crime task force (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Mid-importance). International relations Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Islam: Islam and Controversy / Salaf / Sunni Islam Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Islam and Controversy task force. This article is supported by the Salaf task force. This article is supported by the Sunni Islam task force. Military history: African / British / European / North America / United States / Post-Cold War This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  African military history task force British military history task force European military history task force North American military history task force United States military history task force Post-Cold War task force Nigeria Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nigeria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nigeria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NigeriaWikipedia:WikiProject NigeriaTemplate:WikiProject NigeriaNigeria Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Somalia Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somalia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somalia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomaliaWikipedia:WikiProject SomaliaTemplate:WikiProject SomaliaWikiProject Somalia Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. United Kingdom Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Military history Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force. 2010s Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Archives

Index Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Why was the map showing actual Somali control removed? It actually showed Las Anod under Somali control, which it is. IdioticAnarchist (talk) 14:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• And now the map shows explosive expansion of Al-Shabaab control. I wonder if it is the actual development on the ground or it simply means that the previous maps severely understated jihadists' area control. Gorgedweller (talk) 08:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are egregious claims that Al-Shabaab is still in places like Diinsoor which they were expelled by Amisom 9 years ago and current disputes are handled by the South-West State of Somalia, so the area connecting Diinsoor and Baidoa should be marked red.

The road between between Baidoa and Mogadishu, notabally including towns like Buur Hakaba, should be marked as red, albeit with Al-Shabaab presence in rural areas

Along the Somali-Kenyan border, the area arounf Geriley should be marked as under government allied control, and since the entire border region is under vague control it should be striped.

Beyond that, the Northern areas of Somalia. Namely Khatumo state should only be marked as controlling Talex, Laascaanood, and Buudhoodle. With the Northern and Western parts of the claimed territory under Puntland and Somaliland control respectivily. Emx0264 (talk) 18:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion on the the several maps added in the previous days and their sources was started on Wikimedia Commons Wowzers122 (talk) 21:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ecrusized, under the request of @Cullen328, I want to have a discussion with you about these maps. Zabezt (talk) 04:49, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Zabezt, now what you need to do is explain in detail the specific objections you have to the 2016 map, citing reliable sources. Are you saying that the map was highly inaccurate in 2016, or are you saying that the map no longer reflects the realities in 2024, six years later? Those are different problems with different solutions. Since you object so strongly to the map, you need to explain exactly what your problem with the map is. That's your obligation. Cullen328 (talk) 05:02, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I should probably tell you that isn't the exact argument.. lol, when I said I'll mention your suggestion, I meant that I would try to make it so that even if the file gets updated, you won't get confused with the maps date.

The actual argument is that the map Ecrusized is pushing is referenced from Twitter and an orthopedic projection with no source. Meanwhile the previous one was sourced from an actual website, but the source was 3 years old. So what i have been trying to do is discuss with Ecrusized if he can stop using his map and replace it with a. The previous map with the 3 year old source, or b. a new map referenced from a recent source. Zabezt (talk) 05:19, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

*orthographic Zabezt (talk) 05:20, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zabezt, how can anyone know which maps you are discussing if you do not provide the file names? Which map with a 3 year old source? What is the source and how reliable is it? Cullen328 (talk) 06:23, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.polgeonow.com/2021/12/who-controls-somalia-crisis-timeline.html]https://www.polgeonow.com/2021/12/who-controls-somalia-crisis-timeline.html This map is 3 years old. Zabezt (talk) 09:55, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zabezt, that website has a copyright notice. We can only use a freely licensed or public domain image. Cullen328 (talk) 16:26, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then I guess option b should be used instead, I have seen Ecrusized mention this map: File:Somali Al-Shabaab Offensive (2022-23).svg (sources in the talk page) which seems way more reliable then the Twitter source Ecrusized is currently using, why not ditch Twitter and fully source this map instead? Zabezt (talk) 23:18, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the effort put into creating the map on the Wikipedia article, but it's important to clarify that this map lacks validity as it conflates the mere presence of Al-Shabaab with actual control of territory. From my research, I've already identified numerous inaccuracies in the map's depiction of areas under Al-Shabaab's control. Presence does not equate to control, and such conflation can lead to significant misunderstandings about the situation on the ground. It's crucial that any representation of territorial control be based on precise and verified information. Replayerr (talk) 15:07, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As an outsider, one obvious problem with the map is the stated government control over Jamame which is not corroborated by any reliable source as it seems that al Shabaab still reigns over the city after many years of theie presence Gorgedweller (talk) 21:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can change that if it's necessary. Zabezt (talk) 21:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing consensus here for any particular map. I'm also not seeing discussion as recent as the edit warring. Use dispute resolution methods as needed, but do not edit war. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion regarding this previously took place on commons. Basically Zabezt is adding a map that is not properly citing a source. It is a mix of different articles none of which put a clear picture of the extent of Al-Shabaab control. I am trying to add a significantly different map that directly cites an images regarding the Al-Shabaab control. What concerns me the most is the previous efforts by the user, and their clearly admitted personal interest in the issue (POV), diff here. Ecrusized (talk) 09:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ecrusized, the map is sourced. And it's sourced better than yours. Your map is sourced from a post on Twitter that isnt specific enough, while mine is sourced from a range of sources, (one of them on Somalia's main Wikipedia Article) If you believe the way I handled the discussion was wrong, I'm sorry. We can have an actual one this time. Zabezt (talk) 11:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

From reading Constitutional crisis in Somalia, I am under the impression that Puntland has explicitly declared independence and that Jubaland implicitly has as both have severed ties with the Somali federal government. If this is the case, then the belligerents in the infobox, the map, and the timeline need to be updated.

On the topic of the belligerents, I also think that Somaliland should be listed as a belligerent. GigaDerp (talk) 16:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Considering a battle was just fought between the federal government's Somali National Army and Jubaland's Jubaland Dervish Force, it warrants listing them as separate belligerents. (Also, I was recently renamed from GigaDerp) Sir Ross ★▀▀ (talk) 16:19, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]