This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Languages This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Africa: Eswatini / South Africa This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Eswatini (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject South Africa (assessed as High-importance).

The article sez: "There are four dialects being Shiselweni, Hhoho, Nandzini, and Shiselweni". Shiselweni is two of the four dialects? I think this needs correction, or at the very least, explanation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.243.112.226 (talk) 16:28, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Ethnologue article linked lists the dialects as Baca, Hlubi, Phuthi. The alleged four dialects seem to refer to the four districts of Swaziland, Hhohho, Lubombo, Manzini and Shiselweni (although siSwati is also spoken in adjacent parts of South Africa). -Ahruman 11:24, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It seems worth mentioning that siSwati is the most common term in English in Swaziland, which is probably where it is most often referred to. -Ahruman 11:27, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The language is called siSwati in Swaziland, and the whole of Southern Africa, so who cares what it is called in Zulu? Furthermore, siSwati is regarded as a dialect of isiZulu and isiZulu is taught as an official language in schools in Swaziland. The distinction between siSwati and isiZulu is therefore not as large as the distinction between both languages and isiXhosa (which is a separate, but related, language). 89.240.18.84 (talk) 13:05, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What's with the bizarre precisely given number of speakers? -- Dissident (Talk) 05:11, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's the speaker count given by the Ethnologue, but I agree that it's pretty bizarre to have such a precise number. — mark ✎ 08:42, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Swazi language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120616165748/http://www.eatoni.com/wiki/index.php/Seswati to http://www.eatoni.com/wiki/index.php/Seswati
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070324112647/http://translate.org.za/content/view/17/32/ to http://translate.org.za/content/view/17/32/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070114015602/http://translate.org.za/content/view/1610/54/ to http://translate.org.za/content/view/1610/54/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:00, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As Swaziland has been moved to Eswatini, I think the principle of coherence would have us change the article title from Swazi to its already mentioned alternative Swati (which has always been the name of the language in the language itself, whereas Swazi was the Zulu word for Swati, which didn’t make much sense on the part of English to adopt). 2A01:CB01:3074:95B5:3563:D3C4:3CB2:5BA4 (talk) 19:42, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And soon 102.36.19.37 (talk) 18:12, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's ludziwo, pl. tindziwo. You should ask language-related questions at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language. ―Fezzy1347^{Let’s chat} 21:22, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]