Epstein Files Full PDF

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC This article was accepted from this draft on 10 August 2021 by reviewer Bkissin (talk · contribs). YouTube Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject YouTube To-do: edit history watch purge A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects. Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : see list. Assess : Apply the assessment scale on Unknown-importance YouTube articles + Unassessed YouTube articles Cleanup : See cleanup listing Maintain : This WikiProject Stubs : Category:Stub-Class YouTube articles Other : Substitute {{WikiProject YouTube/Invite Members}} on user talk pages Check out edit requests on Talk:List of YouTubers Internet culture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Internet culture To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from here or here Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention Anime and manga Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

TeamFourStar is notable because they meet the general notability guidelines along with the guidelines for web-based content. Their Dragon Ball Z parody videos have received significant coverage from multiple independent, reliable outlets such as Kotaku, Polygon, Comicbook and CBR, and have received praise from those outlets as well due to its faithfulness to the original Dragon Ball Z franchise. I was actually surprised that there wasn’t a Wikipedia article on them yet, seeing as how they’re one of the biggest anime channels and have been YouTube pioneers since 2008. Not only that, but their Abridged series has its own long branch in the redwood tree that is the legacy of Dragon Ball Z. I would like to add a section to the Dragon Ball page denoting their legacy if this draft were to get accepted.

As for the sources, only two of them might raise concerns in reliability: Dexerto and Screen Rant. For the former, I only used the source once as backed up with reliable outlet Polygon, although I’m unsure why it’s considered unreliable besides it being “clickbait” - at the very least it should be considered situationally reliable, but that’s a conversation on WP:RS/VG for another day. The latter source is listed as a situationally reliable source for entertainment and pop culture topics, which the subject of the article classifies as. The rest should all be considered reliable and significantly cover the channel and their Dragon Ball Z Abridged series. There shouldn’t be any problems with the article, but if there is, message me here on the talk page before declining or accepting the draft. I assume it’s quite unorthodox, but I would appreciate it.

Thanks! PantheonRadiance (talk) 04:06, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think the Buu Bits section should be removed. Not a single news piece or article from any notable source like Kotaku, CBR, Dextero, ComicBook.com, etc. reported on it. And mind you, all of those sites covered TFS in the past.

The only source for it currently in the article is TeamFourStar themselves. The latter half of the section also has no source at all. It's basically original research from a fan's point of view, rather than a neutral point of view. 174.87.117.106 (talk) 04:35, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for the late reply, and I'm not even sure if the OP will ever see this, but thank you for bringing attention to this. I was going to remove that info a while back but kept procrastinating on the off chance a source may cover it, then forgot about it until today. PantheonRadiance (talk) 07:05, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To any TeamFourStar fans wondering why their other series aren't mentioned in the article: the vast majority of their coverage in reliable sources has focused on their Dragon Ball Z: Abridged series. This isn't to say their other series aren't important or significant enough, but rather outlets have seldom covered them to the point that they merit inclusion. If any editor finds good sources such as articles discussing their other works, please feel free to re-include them back into this page. Thanks, PantheonRadiance (talk) 01:40, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]