The Ring (South Park) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
	The Ring (South Park) is part of the South Park (season 13) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones Date Process Result March 24, 2009 Good article nominee Listed March 29, 2010 Good topic candidate Promoted
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 16, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the South Park episode The Ring parodies the Jonas Brothers and the marketing tactics of Walt Disney Company in using the band to pledge abstinence?
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Animation: American / Television / Computer / South Park Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Computer animation work group. This article is supported by the South Park task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Comedy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Disney Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance). United States: Animation / Television / Colorado Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group. This article is supported by American television task force. This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

This article has been mentioned by a media organization: Josh Modell (2009-03-11). "South Park: The Ring". The A.V. Club.

please at least wait for the episode to end before writing the article this time people

Who wrote this article? It has more simple sentences than a fourth grade essay. Mr2b (talk) 04:57, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conan thinks your article is weak. --32.147.203.179 (talk) 06:04, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The episode ended about 4 hours ago...by Wikipedia standards, this article is late. I expanded and improved the plot summary, and I created the template for Season 13; hopefully now the article will be satisfactory to most people.--Antodav2007 (talk) 06:24, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why does it say this was the first episode to be produced in high definition? A few years ago there was a HD version of Good Times with Weapons available on Xbox Live, and the entire 12th season is available on BluRay. 62.220.2.102 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:07, 12 March 2009 (UTC).[reply]

You dolt. They only ever said it was the first HD episode to be BROADCAST. BROOOOAAAD CAAAASSSST.

Yeesh. Calm down, friend. It's an honest mistake. 68.14.133.151 (talk) 01:28, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It depends, however, if any season 12 episodes (or any others for that matter) ran in HD before Wednesday. Socby19 (talk) 20:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"I don't watch it either, but I did this one time because they would be on it. I will never watch that show again! Basically, all I can tell you was it was really, really disgusting. They made fun of them in sort of a subtle way. It made me extremely angry to see them portraying the fans as how they did, because we do NOT act like how they showed us. I'm not going to explain because its nasty. I think every one expected this... but I really, really hope the boys didn't see that episode."

This is a quote from the front page of http://the-jonas-brothers.com. I'd love to include this in the article somehow, or something about reaction from the Jonas Brothers fanbase. But I doubt this quote is notable enough or able to be cited. What do you guys think? --— Hunter Kahn _(contribs) 18:32, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"I'm not going to explain because its nasty." I think a troll. Then again i also think this makes the episode that more funny. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.208.154.249 (talk) 19:25, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"They made fun of them in a sort of subtle way." 76.78.59.130 (talk) 10:27, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Was the giant mickey in reference to something? The reporter mentioned that Mickey would return to Valhalla to rest and feed. Is this a reference to a particular mythological creature? I am not very familiar with Norse mythology. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.47.22.43 (talk) 17:28, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not to my knowledge - I think it was just aimed at being funny. Richard BB 19:02, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it was meant to compare Mickey to idol worshipped deities. Fractyl (talk) 22:22, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is a reference to the old Godzilla movies, where Godzilla went away to rest and feed on Monster Island after a big fight. 99.62.20.120 (talk) 20:55, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You know the "spraying hot foam" thing? IT'S REAL. WTF!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfgqEiXW-OU 71.59.101.148 (talk) 20:13, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that is the most disturbing thing I've seen in my entire life. --72.150.47.229 (talk) 20:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.150.47.229 (talk) 20:16, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Any word from The Mouse?165.97.69.26 (talk) 21:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Doesn't seem so, I've been keeping an eye out for it. — Hunter Kahn _(contribs) 00:59, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you mean they actually haven't sued yet? I would've thought this would've just been the whole scientology thing all over again.The Great Morgil (talk) 02:43, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't make an issue of this on the GA review page for this article, because I don't know how to do it properly, but this article is a bit biased. Check the theme section; it sounds as though the article is agreeing with the content of the episode. There's nothing wrong with quoting a journalist's opinion on the episode, but the article itself should remain completely neutral. There's no deadline to have this pass GA, so slow down people. --Whip it! ^{Now whip it good!} 03:40, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I nominated it because I feel it's ready right now, but in response to your concerns, I added some language to the areas you are discussing, and citations to the top section. If you still feel it's a problem, you can raise those concerns in the GAN review when somebody takes it on, which I understand will be soon. Either they'll be addressed or, if during the review it's determined that it isn't ready, then it won't pass and we'll move on from there. — Hunter Kahn _(contribs) 18:18, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

His opinions should NOT be mentioned in this article. He's not a real TV critic, he's a blogger and an insanely biased one at that. On Obama policy articles, would we post the opinions of the KKK? Why are we doing it for Bozell? --208.38.59.163 (talk) 15:24, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cartman says "And knowing is half the battle." I've heard something like this used in a MADtv skit. Most of the Krumpin ones have Noodles and Nippy saying "And knowing is half the Krump!" Now, knowing MADtv, this could be a reference to something else, but I'm not sure what. Does anyone know? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.3.45.72 (talk) 22:32, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

it's from the old transformers cartoons in which nearly every episode would end with the sentence "And knowing is half the battle" Ultamatecharizard (talk) 19:01, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it's from the G.I. Joe public service announcements. "And knowing is half the battle! G.I. JOOOOOE!" TransOceanic (talk) 16:20, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

u r nerds ask the faq of southparkstudios.com stupids —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.160.226.231 (talk) 15:56, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's from G.I. Joe, don't really need to read the FAQ. I don't think that it's so much a function of nerdiness, as it is having watched cartoons when we were kids. As we obviously still do...Don.molinero (talk) 04:02, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Ring (South Park). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5u4p2N9TC?url=http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/41654 to http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/41654

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:20, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on The Ring (South Park). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090315031608/http://www.inthenews.co.uk/infocus/entertainment/tv/south-park-takes-on-jonas-brothers-%241279745.htm to http://www.inthenews.co.uk/infocus/entertainment/tv/south-park-takes-on-jonas-brothers-%241279745.htm
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5u1h7RFNS?url=http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/03/17/wwe-raw-cars-hannah-montana-and-spongebob-lead-weekly-cable-viewing/14680 to http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/03/17/wwe-raw-cars-hannah-montana-and-spongebob-lead-weekly-cable-viewing/14680
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090330022337/http://parentstv.org/PTC/cable/2009/0320.asp to http://parentstv.org/PTC/cable/2009/0320.asp
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5u4rIRsEJ?url=http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_music_blog/2009/03/jonas-brothers-talk-about-tour-tv-show-and-the-fans.html to http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_music_blog/2009/03/jonas-brothers-talk-about-tour-tv-show-and-the-fans.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:51, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on The Ring (South Park). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090218152804/http://gothamist.com/2009/02/15/simpsons_take_a_new_route_back_to_t.php to http://gothamist.com/2009/02/15/simpsons_take_a_new_route_back_to_t.php
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/faq/archives.php?month=1&year=2010
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5u4ozvGBc?url=http://tv.ign.com/articles/961/961804p1.html to http://tv.ign.com/articles/961/961804p1.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090316051030/http://www.tvguide.com/News/Clooney-ER-30-1003997.aspx to http://www.tvguide.com/News/Clooney-ER-30-1003997.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090323030256/http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/mar/20/think-piece-jonas-brothers-shy-away-from-clean-ima/ to http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/mar/20/think-piece-jonas-brothers-shy-away-from-clean-ima/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090316162010/http://buzzworthy.mtv.com/2009/03/12/was-the-jonas-brothers-south-park-episode-really-that-bad/ to http://buzzworthy.mtv.com/2009/03/12/was-the-jonas-brothers-south-park-episode-really-that-bad/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101124040705/http://www.southparkstudios.com/full-episodes/s13e01-the-ring to http://www.southparkstudios.com/full-episodes/s13e01-the-ring
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101207000640/http://www.southparkstudios.com/guide/episodes/s13e01-the-ring to http://www.southparkstudios.com/guide/episodes/s13e01-the-ring

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:17, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's clearly Dr. Pep-er not Dr. Pepper. All of us have had the ability to pause television shows for a great many years now. And to find an uninformed accusation (or tsk tsk, really) in a paper that was once respected makes it worse. Perhaps the critic knew most people wouldn't bother looking.

Almost every sitcom uses real brands, but most of the time they cover a letter and/or logo with a strip of tape or they turn the items around to show only the ingredients and nutritional information. I always thought it was an allusion to this practice because of the 7Up cans (with no visible name, but what is clearly the 7up logo) sitting next to the Dr. Pep-er can. IIIIsongIIII (talk) 02:02, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]